[ SECRET POST #6177 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6177 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.




























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 24 secrets from Secret Submission Post #883.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

MEH, I think this is a very naive take. Also, it's not a WRITING decision most of the time. It's money. Sequel and prequels gets done because of the money, the writing/creative part is secondary way more often than not (which is why the quality usually drops and/or retcons are done sloppily).

And yeah, I can claim that a series doesn't need a sequel because it's an opinion.
For example, I think that stranger things has been thoroughly ruined by not being a short season. To me doing other seasons was a bad decision because with that they ruined the possibility of a new mainstream market of short contained horror stories aimed at kids/teens (and they even ruined the tension of the first season). But uh... that's my opinion??? Is it a stupid opinion that shouldn't be vocalized because the sequels were a "writing decision" from the part of the creators?

I don't get you. I mean, I kind of get where you're coming from, since people can be very toxic in fandom spaces and discussions can get pretty tiring and futile, but that doesn't mean that your reaction is the right one.
You remind me of those people who start the conversations with ACTUAAAALLY and then spew cynic takes to feel superior.