case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2024-02-29 05:57 pm

[ SECRET POST #6264 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6264 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Fandom: Tiān Guān Cì Fú/Heaven Official's Blessing
Ship: Beefleaf (Shi Qingxuan and He Xuan)]



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.
[Music, Drake/Kendrick Lamar beef, What's the Beef? Youtube channel]



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.
[X-Files s04e10, "Paper Hearts" ]



__________________________________________________



08.

































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 07 secrets from Secret Submission Post #895.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2024-03-01 03:59 am (UTC)(link)
I am always taken aback when I see author notes telling everyone else not to play with their stuff. It's...it's fanfic? It's all about playing with other people's stuff? I do not get it.

A while back I wrote an enormous ridiculous crossover series, and about three different people asked if I would mind if they borrowed my crossover universe to write in. I finally put a note up on my AO3 profile saying for help yourselves to anything that strikes your fancy.

I will admit I was a little pissed off when someone resurrected a fiction I abandoned years ago and wrote an ending for it, but only because they sidelined the main character of my fic (a cat) and wrote a big author note pointing out how the cat did not behave like a real cat. The cat in the story was one of mine, and if I had finished the fic I would have included an author note about my would-be vegetarian, kitten loving old tomcat. I got over it.

(Anonymous) 2024-03-01 07:33 am (UTC)(link)
Cats can't survive on a vegetarian diet, they are obligate carnivores, to put one on one is animal abuse!

(Anonymous) 2024-03-01 10:02 am (UTC)(link)
AYYT -- That's why I said 'would be.' He ate fruit and veg when he could beg or steal it, and I never told him what cat food is made of. But thank you for your performative outrage, it makes me feel like I have really *had* this conversation.

(Anonymous) 2024-03-01 12:42 pm (UTC)(link)
What makes you think it's performative? If you actually had your cat in a vegetarian diet, I can assure that my anger at least would be very real.

(Anonymous) 2024-03-01 07:20 pm (UTC)(link)
NAYRT

It needs be said everytime someone mentions a vegetarian cat. Even if the OP is joking, or if the OP knows better, you can bet at least one idiot reader with a cat starts thinking it is a good idea. There are still too many people trying to give their cats vegetarian, vegan, or even, fuck us all, fruitarian diets because they've been convinced by some idiot on the internet that it is a good idea. And by too many, I mean even one, because even one is two too many. So, yeah, mention it often and every time. And maybe, people, stop making jokes about it too. Somethings always need pushback on.

(Anonymous) 2024-03-01 08:31 pm (UTC)(link)
AYRT--people who just this minute learned the term "obligate carnivore" and think nobody else can possibly have heard it are just exhausting.

(Anonymous) 2024-03-02 07:26 am (UTC)(link)
DA

Who knows if you'll see this because I'm catching up on threads from previous days that I missed, but I agree with you entirely.