ext_278733 ([identity profile] grayout.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-04-07 06:47 pm

[ SECRET POST #092 ]


⌈ Secret Post #092 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 61 secrets from Secret Submission Post #014.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Sunday, April 8th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: Here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[identity profile] bubble.livejournal.com 2007-04-07 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Was it really that hard to "decipher" what point she was trying to make? o__O

[identity profile] ovendoor.livejournal.com 2007-04-07 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)
If someone said something, and someone else disagreed with it, i'd want to know the reason why 8D You can't really understand a persons point of view from the word 'no', and if you can, your brain power exceeds any humans then.

[identity profile] ew-younerd.livejournal.com 2007-04-07 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)
The person said "because if you're writing fiction about homosexual characters, there's tolerance towards it, right?"

They asked "right?" at the end.

Sugartits replied with "no."

Because it is not right. Kentaro Miura in Berserk writes about rape, doesn't mean he tolerates it. I've written incest and paedophilia, it doesn't mean i advocate it, etc. etc.

[identity profile] bubble.livejournal.com 2007-04-07 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)
But she highlighted what she disagreed with, and the reason why/her point of view has been stated MANY times in this post. @_@ I guess my "brain power exceeds any humans", then, because I didn't think it was that cryptic. :/

[identity profile] ovendoor.livejournal.com 2007-04-07 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)
SORRYYY~ i hadn't read the comments above, so i was slow on the uptake~