case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2024-04-17 06:36 pm

[ SECRET POST #6312 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6312 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.

































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 19 secrets from Secret Submission Post #902.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2024-04-18 12:24 am (UTC)(link)
Nah.

That's requiring me to perform as a fan. And secondly, maybe your idea of problematic isn't the same as mine.

And to follow on to that point, many of the people that the internet claims are problematic are problematic to them just because they didn't do this. For example, expecting a Russian...IDK, musician, to decry the war on Ukraine when they're just some musician (who have family there!) and not the Russian government. Might be a left-field example, but you get me.


feotakahari: (Default)

[personal profile] feotakahari 2024-04-18 12:35 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I recently saw a Sami blogger raise a stink because Arknights has a character called Lappland, which apparently means it’s racist against the Sami. Arknights does have problematic characters who’re straight-up referred to as Sami, but Lappland isn’t one of them and the blogger clearly hadn’t done that much research.