[ SECRET POST #6347 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6347 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.
[Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker]



__________________________________________________



06.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 14 secrets from Secret Submission Post #907.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[case]

Name the fandom. And repeats, etc.

(If you think something in this thread is a troll, please ignore it! Conversation is fine, but OT wank makes stuff harder to keep track of in this thread. Thanks.)

(frozen comment)

[fscom]

DAILY LINKS:

General comments → Off-topic discussion thread

Games thread → Thread for games/memes/etc.

[fscom]

01. https://i.imgur.com/9UYZQ3U.jpeg

[fscom]

02. https://i.imgur.com/B1vyYEq.png

[fscom]

03. https://i.imgur.com/gcgGgcy.png

[fscom]

04. https://i.imgur.com/My6JKNN.png

[fscom]

05. https://i.imgur.com/EaEyBT1.png
[Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker]

[fscom]

06. https://i.imgur.com/P6PhfQ2.png

[fscom]

NS, NF, etc.

[fscom]

Official advertise your fandom-related event thread.

RULES FOR THIS:
1. NO images bigger than 600x600 in either direction (banners, et cetera).
2. ONE POST PER USER under this thread.
3. What IS allowed: roleplay advertisements, fandom comms, fandom events, things like that.
4. What is NOT allowed: anything for profit, any kind of fic/art commissions, seeking 1-on-1 RP, that kind of thing.

[fscom]

General comments:

(If the thread contains spoilery/triggery content please warn/post as 2nd comment so it collapses!
Please collapse images, too!)

[fscom]

Games thread!

[(Anonymous)]

Wellll, not everything that's good is enjoyable and vice versa. I've read some books where I thought there were a significant number of flaws in the writing, plot, etc. but still liked aspects of it enough that I didn't regret reading it. But like you, mixed feelings on whether or not I'd reread it.

[(Anonymous)]

Idk, I think it COULD have been a good reveal if this had been something that had actually been intended from the start and had been reflected by consistent thought out writing/foreshadowing. But it wasn't because nothing about this trilogy was consistent OR well thought out so.. yeah.

[(Anonymous)]

I feel the same way, too. I think I'd still have preferred her to be a nobody, but it also would have worked totally fine (aka you can't always get what you want and it doesn't mean it's ruined when a story goes another way) if they'd built up to it. Developed it. Instead it fell just as flat as "Somehow Palpatine returned" to me. :/

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, you'd think people would get that but no. I think the whole "angels/heaven are the real bad guys" thing might be to blame because a lot of people tend to take this as "the guys in heaven are worse so all denizens of hell must be innocent precious babies" when that's... not at all what it is.

(The whole thing reminds me of Hannibal fandom people getting their panties in a twist about certain unsavoury aspects of the characters. In a show about a murderous manipulative cannibal.)

[(Anonymous)]

"Not consistent or well thought out" is classic Star Wars dating from the original trilogy, though. I think some people are used to it or just resigned by now. I know I don't expect a solidly constructed narrative from Star Wars, I just watch it and enjoy the cool spaceship battles.

[(Anonymous)]

I liked it too.

[(Anonymous)]

#Worldle #853 (23.05.2024) 1/6 (100%)
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🎉

https://worldle.teuteuf.fr

[ariakas]

Same, that was my take. If that had been the original intent and it had had the appropriate buildup, it would have been fine. It's not an objectively bad idea on its face.

[erinptah]

Dropping a rec for Madoka Magica here.

Based on 1

[(Anonymous)]

What tropes would you love to see more of but in a different way than their usual portrayal?

Re: Based on 1

[(Anonymous)]

Werewolves, but make them women. There are just not enough lady werewolves in the world.

[(Anonymous)]

They'd have to bleep it, though. No way would any broadcast network air an ad with that title.

[(Anonymous)]

IME, most fandoms for darkish media these days get a few precious twits who need to be outright told that everyone else is here to enjoy the villains, and that no amount of "but they're evil" is going to stop people from, you know ... enjoying the villains.