[ SECRET POST #6348 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6348 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 08 secrets from Secret Submission Post #907.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

See I'm a bit torn on this. Sure, what a person says they identify with should count the most but sometimes, the facts just really contradict this. Like someone who says they're asexual but also say they're sexually attracted to others and like to have sex a lot out of sexual attraction. Theyre simply are not asexual.

(Also reminds me of the dude in this comm a few years ago who kept insisting he was gay while recounting his relationship with his female fuckbuddy turned girlfriend turned wife. Sorry, but no matter what you identify as, you like to fuck women, you are attracted to them and you marry one, you're functionally bi.)

[(Anonymous)]

Yeahhhhhhh there's some point where a person's identification just doesn't make sense in light of the facts. But I just generally want to err so much on the side of letting people figure out their own identities. It is just so hard, and identities can be so complicated - we are trying to shove all of this complex reality of human sexuality and gender into a handful of boxes and so I basically believe in giving people a lot of latitude to take those boxes and figure out how to make them work for their own experience and sense of self.

[(Anonymous)]

+1000