case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2024-07-03 06:37 pm

[ SECRET POST #6389 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6389 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 17 secrets from Secret Submission Post #913.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Entertainment news (warning for discussion of sexual assault)

(Anonymous) 2024-07-04 02:57 am (UTC)(link)
It's a pretty big jump from fucking your child's nanny to sexual assault.

Quit buying into TERFs wanting to fuck up and discredit trans allies. You're going to prove to them that they can do this willy nilly and they'll start accusing EVERYONE they hate of it.

Re: Entertainment news (warning for discussion of sexual assault)

(Anonymous) 2024-07-04 11:28 am (UTC)(link)
I mean thats a pretty big power differential. Fucking your employee is never a good look.

Re: Entertainment news (warning for discussion of sexual assault)

(Anonymous) 2024-07-04 01:00 pm (UTC)(link)
It's still a pretty big leap. Yeah, it's gross, but like... It's a pretty big leap, especially when one of the people accusing him and saying they have deets supports fucking Ghilsaine Maxwell. Forgive me for thinking she has the best interests of anyone at heart here.

NAYRT

(Anonymous) 2024-07-04 09:40 pm (UTC)(link)
It’s actually not a big leap. How much agency did the nanny have against her rich and famous employer who came onto her? General consensus in most western societies (and the legal decision in many) is that she had little to no agency. quid pro quo is assumed and an employer doesn’t have to verbalize a threat against an employee’s job because it’s baked in.

Re: Entertainment news (warning for discussion of sexual assault)

(Anonymous) 2024-07-04 10:02 pm (UTC)(link)
as soon as you started screaming TERF, it nullified anything you had to say afterwards. please grow up.

signed, a Leftist

Re: Entertainment news (warning for discussion of sexual assault)

(Anonymous) 2024-07-05 07:47 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, but what do TERFs have to do with Gaiman and SA?