Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2024-07-13 02:14 pm
[ SECRET POST #6399 ]
⌈ Secret Post #6399 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 46 secrets from Secret Submission Post #915.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Trump got shot?
Re: Trump got shot?
(Anonymous) 2024-07-14 02:24 pm (UTC)(link)Here's to hoping that pans out.
Re: Trump got shot?
(Anonymous) 2024-07-14 07:00 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Trump got shot?
(Anonymous) 2024-07-14 07:47 pm (UTC)(link)Because the alternative is Project 2025 (or project 2029, 2034, 2037 or whatever year the Nazis try to claim if we let our guards down).
(Obviously, if you are not an eligible US voter, then this isn't directed at you. And if you are in a stupidly gerrymandered area or someplace subjected to great voter suppression, I sympathize but I hope you will find a way to vote anyway.)
Re: Trump got shot?
(Anonymous) 2024-07-14 09:54 pm (UTC)(link)But that didn't happen, and I sure as fuck didn't want a second term of Trump, so I got the hell out there and voted in November of that year. If we do lose this year, it's not going to be because of Trump and his supporters, it's going to be because of the indredibly defeatist, short-sighted attitude of the Democrats and voters who care more about finding that "perfect candidate" than they do looking at the bigger picture. Yes, Biden's running, but he's not the only one on the ballot, and our conversation should be focusing more on what a second temr of his administration can do in terms of addressing the issues with the Supreme Court, and what other efforts we can take to ensure things like LGBTQ+ and reproductive rights and so on are protected at all costs, and things of that sort.
To say nothing of how, if Biden wins, since he won't have to worry about running again, he and his administration might be able to be a little bolder in ways they weren't able to be the first time around. Use that Supreme Court "immunity" ruling to his advantage, for all I care.
But no, apparently we don't need to have that conversation. Totally better for people to just throw up their hands, say, "Well, that's that, then" and continue with this stupid age discourse.
(I do think there is a valid conversation to be had about age limits for politicians, mind, but the way it's being done here now is not it. And it's far too late, too, in this case, so it's just irrelevant side tracks that do nothing to address the actual issues we're facing.)