Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2024-07-19 05:17 pm
[ SECRET POST #6405 ]
⌈ Secret Post #6405 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07. [SPOILERS for House of the Dragon]

__________________________________________________
08. [SPOILERS for Centaurworld]

__________________________________________________
09. [WARNING for discussion of both real life and fictional rape/sexual assault]

__________________________________________________
10. [WARNING for discussion of Neil Gaiman/sexual assault allegations]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #915.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Sex question from your friendly asexual
(Anonymous) 2024-07-19 10:46 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Sex question from your friendly asexual
(Anonymous) 2024-07-19 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Sex question from your friendly asexual
(Anonymous) 2024-07-19 10:55 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Sex question from your friendly asexual
(Anonymous) 2024-07-19 10:57 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Sex question from your friendly asexual
(Anonymous) 2024-07-19 11:01 pm (UTC)(link)A Fellow Confused Ace
(Anonymous) 2024-07-19 11:08 pm (UTC)(link)Re: A Fellow Confused Ace
(Anonymous) 2024-07-20 01:45 am (UTC)(link)Re: A Fellow Confused Ace
(Anonymous) 2024-07-20 02:08 am (UTC)(link)Re: Sex question from your friendly asexual
(Anonymous) 2024-07-19 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Sex question from your friendly asexual
(Anonymous) 2024-07-19 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Sex question from your friendly asexual
(Anonymous) 2024-07-20 12:50 am (UTC)(link)Re: Sex question from your friendly asexual
(Anonymous) 2024-07-20 01:23 am (UTC)(link)Re: Sex question from your friendly asexual
(Anonymous) 2024-07-20 01:52 am (UTC)(link)JFC I hate the term "allosexual."
"A" as a prefix means "lack/absence of." The opposite of "asexual" is sexual, not "other-sexual" or "auto-sexual." There's absolutely no reason to attach the "allo" prefix to it.
Re: Sex question from your friendly asexual
(Anonymous) 2024-07-20 02:49 am (UTC)(link)Re: Sex question from your friendly asexual
(Anonymous) 2024-07-20 03:10 am (UTC)(link)A word that means more than one thing depending on context is called a "homonym." This is a normal and common thing in language, and does not necessitate its decomposition into separate words. If I say, "boy, that bark is really loud," you know I'm not talking about the bark on the nearby maple tree. If I say, "I'm gonna pound that guy," you know I'm not talking about British currency. And in a conversation about attraction, we know what "sexual" means. The idea that we need to add a prefix onto it or there might be confusion between it and its homonym is nonsense.
Re: Sex question from your friendly asexual
(Anonymous) 2024-07-20 05:27 am (UTC)(link)I mean it definitely has a time and place. for example "an allosexual 15 year old" has a different connotation and possible meaning from "a sexual 15 year old" which can easily be taken to mean "sexually active" as opposed to "not being asexual" ... and is also a really awkward phrase.
Also "allosexual friends" = groups of people who are not ace; "sexual friends" can be mistaken for FWBs. Or "I asked my allosexual partner about this" vs "I asked my sexual partner about this"...
There are times when sexual person and allosexual person can be used interchangeably without confusion and there are times when the former does cause confusion, because context does that too
Re: Sex question from your friendly asexual
(Anonymous) 2024-07-20 02:56 am (UTC)(link)Signed, a different asexy anon
Re: Sex question from your friendly asexual
(Anonymous) 2024-07-20 03:15 am (UTC)(link)Re: Sex question from your friendly asexual
(Anonymous) 2024-07-20 06:24 am (UTC)(link)Re: Sex question from your friendly asexual
(Anonymous) 2024-07-20 08:59 am (UTC)(link)Re: Sex question from your friendly asexual
(Anonymous) 2024-07-20 10:16 am (UTC)(link)Having met plenty of language pedants in my time (and, er, being one myself, though my language pedantry falls along different lines than the AYRT), I think it's equally or more likely that the AYRT is sincere in their appeal to grammar.
However, I also think that there are circumstances--including this one--where language evolves in direct pursuit of greater clarity, and that this is something to be embraced rather than rejected.
Re: Sex question from your friendly asexual
(Anonymous) - 2024-07-20 10:19 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Sex question from your friendly asexual
(Anonymous) 2024-07-20 01:48 am (UTC)(link)Look at it this way: There are people out there with such poor impulse control and shaky morals that they'll steal a coworker's lunch out of a shared refrigerator. Enough people will that there's memes and whatnot about it. But it would be wildly inaccurate to claim that no hungry person can resist an unguarded lunchbox.
Sexual desire is just a different type of hunger and there are horny people who will totally steal someone else's Snack because they're there and they're hot. It's not just because they're allo and horny though.
Also, unlike a ham sandwich, the "stolen" boyfriend typically has some say in the matter.
Re: Sex question from your friendly asexual
(Anonymous) 2024-07-20 02:57 am (UTC)(link)Re: Sex question from your friendly asexual
(Anonymous) 2024-07-20 03:52 am (UTC)(link)Re: Sex question from your friendly asexual
Risky sexual behavior is listed as a symptom. Heck when I was hypomanic years ago I nearly got in a relationship with a woman who was a walking red flag. She even said she didn't "believe in" safe words. Suggested a limited quota of opt outs. *shudder*