[ SECRET POST #6405 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6405 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________


















07. [SPOILERS for House of the Dragon]




__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for Centaurworld]




__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for discussion of both real life and fictional rape/sexual assault]




__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for discussion of Neil Gaiman/sexual assault allegations]







































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #915.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Imagine if every single reader of people's fic left an honest comment? And it was just endless spam of "meh it was alright, not too great though, trope-y and predictable, skip unless bored, 2/5"?

The authors desperate for validation would be immediately screaming for it to stop

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt

I was actually thinking about that because some of my very honest comments would be along the lines of "Kind of an interesting premise, but your characterization is all over the place - have you actually watched the show? You started the scene with the characters in a car, but then they were suddenly in an apartment, and you need to fix that. You mean 'discreet' not 'discrete', they are trying to be circumspect not distinct; you mean 'fazed' not 'phased', they are disturbed not going through a staged process, and you mean 'warily' not 'wearily', they are suspicious not tired. And your resolution is rushed. You could do this a lot better."

[(Anonymous)]

I would kill for that kind of feedback, no lie!

[(Anonymous)]

These days that would be considered toxic and hateful I'm afraid; only sucking the author's metaphorical dick is acceptable, otherwise GTFO and STFU.

[(Anonymous)]

An honest comment? Sure. But helpful or insightful? No.

[(Anonymous)]

"Feed your authors comments" doesn't specify.

I bet more people would feel differently about it if authors specifically felt entitled to praise, though.