case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2024-08-22 07:11 pm

[ SECRET POST #6439 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6439 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.
[Harley Quinn]



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 07 secrets from Secret Submission Post #920.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Hanson

(Anonymous) 2024-08-22 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)
-Reverse google image search and wikipedia later-

Having a gross, fashie private pintrest and getting anti-lockdown is so fucking tame. Jesus I thought someone was abusing fans or killing animals. This is like a 4 out of 10 on the richter scale.

I fully understand why you don't want to be a fan anymore, and how it taints your memories. Give yourself some grace to feel your feelings.

Re: Hanson

(Anonymous) 2024-08-23 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
nayrt

tbf to OP, I think abusing animals or fans would be far behind 'yikes'. the description is pretty apt lol

Re: Hanson

(Anonymous) 2024-08-23 12:14 am (UTC)(link)
beyond*

ugh autocorrect
azurelunatic: Vivid pink Alaskan wild rose. (Default)

Re: Hanson

[personal profile] azurelunatic 2024-08-23 12:28 am (UTC)(link)
I did the reverse image search and then Hanson Yikes and arrived at
https://www.reddit.com/r/postHanson/comments/gzp5t0/hansongate_timeline_what_happened/

which, thank goodness it wasn't worse but still Yuck. I wish them a very nice slide into obscurity and historical footnote in late 90s/early 2000s culture.

Re: Hanson

(Anonymous) 2024-08-23 06:08 am (UTC)(link)
Are you calling it "fashie" because cutesifying it means "only slightly fascist; only fascist adjacent" or is it actually fascist and you just felt like making fascism sound cute?

Re: Hanson

(Anonymous) 2024-08-23 10:41 am (UTC)(link)
Not the anon you replied to, but looking at the drama, I'm guessing the first one -- they meant it in the "soft fascist/fascist-adjacent" sense. It seems to be things like taking the cops' side in police killings of black people, being 2nd amendment boosters, believing there's a war on Christmas/Christianity, and being lockdown skeptics. Very bog-standard/normal for conservatives in the U.S., who have unfortunately been quite a bit soft fascist/flirting with fascism for a while, while not being full-blown fascist IMO.

That said, I'm still a bit o_o; at the AYRT brushing even soft fascist off as tame. Like, in some sense, you do have to realize that celebrities are humans and many of them come from very conservative social circles and so are liable to have opinions common in their social circles. On the other hand, though, just because these opinions are COMMON doesn't mean they are any less abhorrent; I completely understand OP having an immediate "YIKES NO" reaction to it. I wouldn't call it tame. :/

Re: Hanson

(Anonymous) 2024-08-23 12:18 pm (UTC)(link)
i thought this was lostprophets

Re: Hanson

(Anonymous) 2024-08-23 06:27 pm (UTC)(link)
That one is arguably much worse.

Re: Hanson

(Anonymous) 2024-08-23 07:18 pm (UTC)(link)
"Arguably" nothing.