[ SECRET POST #6497 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6497 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.
[Fandom: 19 and Counting/Counting On, Bringing Up Bates]



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 38 secrets from Secret Submission Post #929.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[thewakokid]

100% agree.

It was a fucking travesty.

To be honest, I felt the bond films had been building to something like this when they started to go less episodic. I don't mind the occasional nod to canon, but whole movies that are just continuations of the last movies story isn't really a bond thing.

I'd let Casino Royale stand, and put in everything after. Which is a shame, because I didn't hate some of them, but reverting the films to one shots is the way to go.

[(Anonymous)]

Assuming you mean the Niven CR, then yep. If we're talking about Blondie Bondie then only Skyfall counts.

[thewakokid]

No, I thought Craig's CR was ok as a stand alone film.

But I could live with keeping Skyfall too. Shame about M

[(Anonymous)]

Getting rid of her was the best part of it, she was the worst part of the Brosnan era. They should never have kept that aspect when they did the Creg era.

[thewakokid]

Oh, you and me are not in harmony here.

I admit she didn't have the same chemistry she had with Brosnan, but I view that as another mark against craig, and not a mark against here. I thought she was a good M.