[ SECRET POST #6526 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6526 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Sonic the hedgehog/Unleashed/Night of the Werehog]



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 30 secrets from Secret Submission Post #933.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

I am curious if you genuinely don't "see"/understand or if you just don't agree?

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

I genuinely don't understand why fictional incest would be inherently immoral.

You could give me a list of circumstances in which it may be creepy or problematic especially if presented as totally fine and okay between people of huge power imbalances and pedophilia or something, but you could do that for any other kink or type of ship as well.

None of that makes ficitonal incest/those kinks/types of ships inherently immoral, though. Just the fact that circumstances had to be specified proves they're not always immoral by themselves just for existing, or no circumstances would need citing.

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

da but generally incest is thought to be immoral because of the idea that there are inherent power imbalances in a relationship like that. However, if you have a situation where two characters who are blood siblings are raised completely separately from each other and never meet or even know they have a sibling until they're adults, would it still be considered "immoral" when there are no built-in power dynamics?

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT, but anon above

This is also part of it tbh. Whether it's moral or immoral real life incest, which always gets dragged into the conversation, I don't understand what it has to do with fictional incest or how it makes fictional incest inherently immoral.

Rape IRL for example is inherently immoral. Fictional rape is not inherently immoral and I don't understand why someone would think so. Sure, an entire situation could be judged as immoral if someone is writing about it in fiction and then telling people this is fine and ideal and how relations between husband and wife should be, or other bullshit like that. But having to say "this thing in fiction can be immoral if you do all this other stuff about it" just proves it isn't inherently so.

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

*Writing about fictional rape is not inherently immoral, to be clear. The in-character act itself within the world is still immoral, obviously. But so is every villain ever written

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

Oh, I agree - I was just making the argument that even in real life situations, things aren't always inherently moral or immoral, so that holds even less true in fiction where there are no real people involved.