[ SECRET POST #6549 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6549 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 18 secrets from Secret Submission Post #936.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[thewakokid]

We're going the wrong way.

Ok, hollywood is a vacuum of creativity, All they know is remake... But why Live Action remakes of animated classics? Why do a LESS magical and whimsical version of old magical and whimsical movies? Why not take old movies that were limited by the effects of their day and do an ANIMATED version?

I know we're getting wicked soon, but why not a Disney hand-drawn era style animated version of the Wizard of Oz? And the sequel? Hell, if it takes off, do the whole Oz books.

ANIMATE the Harry Potter films? The Percy Jackson series? I remember there was a sinbad movie back in the 2000's somewhere, why just one? Why not Animate all the old movies? All the Ray Harryhausen movies? Clash?

You can accomplish way more by animating Live Action than you can by making live action out of Animation. And all with the same lack of creativity.

[(Anonymous)]

You're very correct!

[(Anonymous)]

It might be cheaper, or there's some obscure bit of IP law they're trying to take advantage of.

[(Anonymous)]

completely agree to this! animation >>> live action any day for me

[(Anonymous)]

when the worst person you know says something that you don't disagree with