case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2024-12-27 05:47 pm

[ SECRET POST #6566 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6566 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.
[The Boy and the Heron]



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for And Just Like That... (Sex and the City sequel)]




__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Arcane Season 2]




__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of assault/abuse]




__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for discussion of noncon]




__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for discussion of sexual assault/abuse]















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #938.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2024-12-27 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Well for what its worth, its not like you're approving of irl peoples suffering. Sometimes fiction can be used to explore fucked up things from creating or just reading it.
Sometimes it can lead to personal reflections or provoking your own opinions since that's also what art can do - but sometimes its not that deep either.
erinptah: (Default)

[personal profile] erinptah 2024-12-28 12:27 am (UTC)(link)
This. Squicks don't have to be logical or consistent!

When it comes to bad things happening to fictional characters, as long as you're not saying "the fiction that repels me personally is objectively morally worse" and harassing the writers over it, you're probably good.