[ SECRET POST #6566 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6566 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.
[The Boy and the Heron]



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for And Just Like That... (Sex and the City sequel)]




__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Arcane Season 2]




__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of assault/abuse]




__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for discussion of noncon]




__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for discussion of sexual assault/abuse]















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #938.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Book ban stuff is associated with conservatives, but progressives want to limit the availability of books they don't like, as well. The difference is that they tend to attack them at the publishing level.

That said, I have librarian friends who make it very clear that they won't add to the collection books that they find troublesome, or whose authors they have qualms with.

[feotakahari]

Huh. I don’t think that’s against ALA code, but the IFLA certainly wouldn’t like it.

Then again, I don’t actually believe in most professional ethics.