[ SECRET POST #6569 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6569 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 24 secrets from Secret Submission Post #939.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: ?

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt - I guess I just don't see someone saying something isn't canon as a major insult or obnoxious. I also didn't understand that this secret saying something wasn't canon was just OP, I thought they literally meant the show had a throwaway line or something that did that.

Thanks for answering though.

Re: ?

[(Anonymous)]

That's what I thought, too.

I'm not a Trekkie, my Treks are TNG and Voy(kinda), so what was the de-canonizing of Disco? I'm curious.

Also, congrats to the canonizing of BashirXGarak!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pIZ4B4vjUU

Re: ?

[(Anonymous)]

DA I’ve been hearing about this for like a week or two. My understanding, and google seems to confirm it, is that in a single universe setting, Discovery is decanonized. But it’s possible that we’re only seeing part of a multiverse and Star Trek does have a history of using multiverses. So basically anyone can say it’s canon and be correct and anyone can say it isn’t canon and be correct.

I suspect this was intentional because canceling it would have caused a shitstorm but it’s an objectively bad series with poor reviews and even worse viewing figures. I’m not really sure how they can sever Discovery without severing SNW though. I know when SNW has been brought on FS before people hated it but it’s done well with critics and very well with audiences.