[ SECRET POST #6598 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6598 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 22 secrets from Secret Submission Post #943.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Question.

[(Anonymous)]

Yes, the whole team have to be able to communicate for safety reasons - Person A is literally turning their back and walking away from Person B when they try to co-ordinate with them.

C-Z are definitely a sleeper problem in my mind - they might not be loud racists, but a whispering racist is still a racist and its difficult to reverse that kind of attitude shift in a department.

Thank you for answering me!

Re: Question.

[(Anonymous)]

Then right yeah, there's nobody that's the good guy here.

Person A is unqualified for the job, and the job should have its description and requirements updated to include that they must be able to directly interact and co-ordinate with the rest of the team. Then people with hangups about that would not be able to apply as they're missing a key requirement. This is a logistics issue, not an HR issue.

Person B is reacting to a reasonable complaint in an unreasonable way. This is an HR issue, not a logistics issue.

C-Z are HR issues. lol

Re: Question.

[(Anonymous)]

SA

To be more clear I don't think Person A did anything necessarily wrong; the company is the one that hired the person presumably knowing that they couldn't interact. The mistake made was there and should be addressed on that end. Like if they need someone that's able to speak Spanish for a job, they need to list that and not hire someone who can't do that. If they hire that person, that's their mistake.

Re: Question.

[(Anonymous)]

SA sorry for so many replies

However if the job description did state things about co-ordinating with the team being a job responsibility then yeah Person A is not doing their job. Idk with no details it's hard to tell but like this is more of a legal/contract issue than an HR one.

Re: Question.

[(Anonymous)]

No, I really appreciate your perspective! I'm a bit too paranoid to give real details to add context, but I get the point you're making and it is a valid one.