[ SECRET POST #6614 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6614 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 06 secrets from Secret Submission Post #945.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Maybe it's just me, but doing more of the same thing uncritically, with no point of view or statement to make, doesn't register as exploration or examination of anything to me.

[(Anonymous)]

So honest question. When you look at that screenshot, you see a blind copy of hyperfemininity? Rather than a gross exaggeration meant to draw attention to the absurdity of it?

[(Anonymous)]

I see people doing a performance that may once have started as critiquing hyperfemininity but have now moved on to copying each other and performing hyperfemininity in ways that have been very set and unoriginal for the past 20 years.

Let me put it this way: saying 'drag examines femininity' to me is like saying 'fanfiction examines literature.' I'm sure there are individuals out there that do that, and that at one point both of those things might have originated that way, but I would not say either of those things is broadly true any more.

Most of it is just fun and tropes and there's nothing wrong with it being just fun and tropes.

[(Anonymous)]

SA Like I said I have zero issues with drag, I just don't see why we must assign meaning to it when most of the people I know that do drag today are literally just like 'yay lets dress up and act ultra femme, it's fun to do and perform'. Same goes for assigning meaning and virtue to fanfic when most people are like 'yay lets write about Ganondorf plowing Link'

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, I get what you're saying, and that's cool. Of course it's a fun pastime and meant for entertainment. I'm not saying anyone must assign meaning to it.

[(Anonymous)]

So another honest question. Would you say that the source material has changed significantly in the past 20 years?

[(Anonymous)]

I think my point was missed: I don't feel that most drag performances are critiquing any source material at all any more, nor are they even critiques. It has moved on to become its own thing that enjoys hyperfemininity and is copying its own internal tropes just like fanfic has ABO and BDSM universes that aren't related to canons at all.

[(Anonymous)]

"copying each other and performing hyperfemininity in ways that have been very set and unoriginal for the past 20 years."

That's like mainstream drag? Or drag is that is the most visible I guess? I've seen very different types of drag, which explore queerness and idendity and not just hyperfemininity.

[(Anonymous)]

Let me put it this way: saying 'drag examines femininity' to me is like saying 'fanfiction examines literature.' I'm sure there are individuals out there that do that, and that at one point both of those things might have originated that way, but I would not say either of those things is broadly true any more.

[(Anonymous)]

Have you been to actual drag shows?