case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2025-04-11 06:57 pm

[ SECRET POST #6671 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6671 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________













































03. [SPOILERS for Xenoblade X]




__________________________________________________



04. [WARNING for discussion of suicide]

[Final Fantasy XVI]



__________________________________________________



05. [WARNING for discussion of transphobia]




__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for discussion of rape, vore, snuff, et cetera]




__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of JKR/transphobia]




__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for discussion of non-con, rape]





























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #952.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2025-04-11 11:36 pm (UTC)(link)
da

Haha, came here to say this. She was acting like it was obvious the whole time. Like, I don't care if he is or not, but there wasn't a whole lot to go on to conclude that (though I'm sure some better than me at spotting subtext will argue CONCLUSIVELY! that this or that event from the books was the smoking gun).

(Anonymous) 2025-04-11 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
How can you argue CONCLUSIVELY! based on subtext?

(Anonymous) 2025-04-11 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)
It's a joke.