[ SECRET POST #6735 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6735 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.
[The Blacklist]



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 50 secrets from Secret Submission Post #964.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[thewakokid]

See, this is what I mean: Does anyone think this dude is reachable with ANY fact that doesn't back up his righteous fury and that the people who didn't vote in line with his priorities are still allowed to walk around like real human beings?

Does anyone think in 3 months time when all the news is out, all the facts are known to the public that there is a state of reality for this kinda person that isn't either "MAGA ARE MURDERERS! REMEMBER WHATS-HER-NAME BACK IN JUNE!" or "MAGA ARE MURDERERS! *Vague mumbling about words being violence and trans genocide*"

Can ANYONE envision a 3rd state for this chap?

[(Anonymous)]

DA

Yes? All they did was point out a piece of information. I don't see anything in that comment insisting he was maga, only that the shooter being on a committee doesn't make him not maga, in reference to your point here: "I have a hard time believing a far right trump worshiping psycho would be willing... or permitted for that matter... to work that closely to a tampon Tim project"

The person not being neutral here or able to neutrally gauge information really looks like it's you here. I'm not trying to insult you, honestly, but maybe step back and evaluate for real, whether you're reacting to this whole thing emotionally regarding things you expect to be hearing from the types of people you assume are here, as opposed to things people are actually saying.

[thewakokid]

Go and speak to a maga. A real maga I mean. Bought the Hat, insists trump will release the epstein list any day now, dyed in the wool maga person. Just the one. I'm sure if you unblock one for a few mins you will see what I mean. And then offer them the chance to work on a Business Development committee proposed by Tim Walz. Give them a couple of mins to stop laughing, and then report back. That would be the default maga, btw. Not the maga super soldier we're pretending this guy is. The "Yes mr president I will kill your enemies for you, I am your number one guy"

The rest of this is a little... for want of a better word... gaslighty "I'm not insulting you, you're just being emotional about the perfectly neutral tone of the person you responded to!"

I commend the effort, I really do, it's a classic and beautifully executed, but I don't really buy it.

[(Anonymous)]

??? MAGA politicians work under Democratic governors all the time. And again, this is not someone working closely with Walz. It is someone on a business development committee. They likely never saw each other and Walz probably couldn't tell you his name. Do you think these committees are important to people outside of their immediate community?

[thewakokid]

Cope & seethe, hermano. Sneed & Mald while you're at it.

Stop responding to Waco

[(Anonymous)]

Ever. Don't feed the troll.

Re: Stop responding to Waco

[(Anonymous)]

He's throwing a tantrum because his girlfriend is too busy to entertain him.

Re: Stop responding to Waco

[(Anonymous)]

Be serious. He doesn't have a girlfriend and never has.

Re: Stop responding to Waco

[(Anonymous)]

What, Rosie Palms couldn't show up for him?

Re: Stop responding to Waco

[(Anonymous)]

Handrea isn't one for threesomes, you see.

Re: Stop responding to Waco

[(Anonymous)]

Exactly. He's a privileged idiot who still wouldn't get it if his government was fully taken over by fascists tomorrow and he had to start living the life of a marginalized person. There's no arguing with people who don't listen to facts and think that other people's suffering is a great big joke. Just tell him to go fuck himself and move on. Or ignore him, either way.

[(Anonymous)]

I also commend the effort but is wako actually worth it?

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

This is what I mean, man. I didn't mention anything about the tone of the person you responded to, mostly because you and they interacted with the same tone that you were using in the post they responded to. I pointed out they gave you info and you read a ton into it that they didn't say. You then read a ton into my comment that I didn't say, and assumed a lot about me that isn't true.

It's not a bad thing to be emotional, it was genuinely not an insult. But it can get in the way if you're trying to talk to people.

[(Anonymous)]

DA - they're angry because you, not even an American, come in talking about our political system and news and shit like you have insider information and you always seem to be bashing "the left" and sounding like an instigator or a troll.

I don't even know why you're so obsessed with our politics when you are so misinformed most of the time.

[thewakokid]

A solid attempt. Deserves a reply bare minimum.

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt - an attempt at what?

[(Anonymous)]

Pretty sure he's either drunk/high/had a bad mental day or is trolling. His replies aren't really making much sense today. And I say that as someone who doesn't have a hate boner for the guy and happily chats fandom with him.

[thewakokid]

C'mon, man. You were closer when you were on the anti-semitism meme (Might not be you, but VERY similar tactics and style, so I'm just going to call it) An attempt to get under my skin and shame me into being quiet about a topic you'd rather be the only voice on. It was a solid attempt, but gets weaker every time you use it, and the "Who me?" is weaker still.

almost as embarrasing as your "I usually like you / don't hate you, but this isn't something you should be saying" schtick (not you either).

I know not everyone who hates me is the same dude. I'm pretty certain the guy who is obsessed with me and trump scat is playing his own game in his own field, and we're all just spectating. But the "You're cringe / stupid / ignorant but don't be offended it comes from a place of wanting you to be quiet for your own good" stuff is (almost) absolutely the same dude. You got SOME wiggle room on the specific wording possibly being different people but not the tone. and not the fact that one commentor / tactic disappears COMPLETELY as the other one starts up.

[(Anonymous)]

Da
Dude, whichever drugs you're taking, maybe go easy on that for a bit. You're sounding a bit unhinged.

[(Anonymous)]

I think you might have replied to the wrong thread.

[(Anonymous)]

Finish your vodka bath, wannabe Russian

[(Anonymous)]

did a lefty say mean things to you on the internet and hurt your feelings? is that why they all must pay? grow up.