Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2025-06-14 04:03 pm
[ SECRET POST #6735 ]
⌈ Secret Post #6735 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

[The Blacklist]
__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 50 secrets from Secret Submission Post #964.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-06-14 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)Yes? All they did was point out a piece of information. I don't see anything in that comment insisting he was maga, only that the shooter being on a committee doesn't make him not maga, in reference to your point here: "I have a hard time believing a far right trump worshiping psycho would be willing... or permitted for that matter... to work that closely to a tampon Tim project"
The person not being neutral here or able to neutrally gauge information really looks like it's you here. I'm not trying to insult you, honestly, but maybe step back and evaluate for real, whether you're reacting to this whole thing emotionally regarding things you expect to be hearing from the types of people you assume are here, as opposed to things people are actually saying.
no subject
The rest of this is a little... for want of a better word... gaslighty "I'm not insulting you, you're just being emotional about the perfectly neutral tone of the person you responded to!"
I commend the effort, I really do, it's a classic and beautifully executed, but I don't really buy it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-06-14 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Stop responding to Waco
(Anonymous) 2025-06-14 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Stop responding to Waco
(Anonymous) 2025-06-14 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Stop responding to Waco
(Anonymous) 2025-06-15 12:26 am (UTC)(link)Re: Stop responding to Waco
(Anonymous) 2025-06-15 12:28 am (UTC)(link)Re: Stop responding to Waco
(Anonymous) 2025-06-15 03:50 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Stop responding to Waco
(Anonymous) 2025-06-15 03:49 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-06-15 03:26 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-06-14 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)This is what I mean, man. I didn't mention anything about the tone of the person you responded to, mostly because you and they interacted with the same tone that you were using in the post they responded to. I pointed out they gave you info and you read a ton into it that they didn't say. You then read a ton into my comment that I didn't say, and assumed a lot about me that isn't true.
It's not a bad thing to be emotional, it was genuinely not an insult. But it can get in the way if you're trying to talk to people.