[ SECRET POST #6762 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6762 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________

















06. [WARNING for discussion of death, rape/sexual assault]





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #965.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fscom]

03. https://i.imgur.com/rr3AnKP.png

[(Anonymous)]

Anyone who tries to claim the movie isn't skeevy is a walking red flag. I love that movie, but it is skeevy and problematic as hell.

I also had no idea Burt Reynolds was up for the role. It is kind of hilarious to think of him instead of Gere. You're right that it is a totally different energy! Personally, I think Richard Gere is incredibly creepy and so worked really well for the role.

[(Anonymous)]

I agree with everything in this secret. Gere was a better choice here, for sure.

I would like to see a sort of take on this plot where the rich guy was more of a nerd, tho, and the call girl also fixes his style. (Buying that an extremely attractive and together rich guy needed a call girl strains credulity, and also sets an unhealthy standard for sugar daddy shit when you know most of the RL men that are paying for "companionship" are kind of gnarly.