case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2025-09-08 06:47 pm

[ SECRET POST #6821 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6821 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.
(Maisie Dobbs series)



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 41 secrets from Secret Submission Post #974.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2025-09-09 01:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Normal identifiers being used as insults is not remotely on par with systemic slurs.
That's like saying "girl" can be a slur because GNC boys and trasmascs can be called "a girl" as an insult.

(Anonymous) 2025-09-09 06:43 pm (UTC)(link)
So we're going to deliberately ignore that "queer" has been a continually used self identifier for people of all kinds of lgbt+ persuasions for nearly a century then? I don't know why I expect people to know anything about lgbt history tbh, it's like nothing exists to half of you except whatever was being pushed by radfems on Tumblr in the mid 2010s. Which is, btw, where the "queer is a slur and only a slur" revisionism originated. The decades-old queer history dept started in the 80s by activists at a lot of universities would beg to differ, as would the aforementioned AIDS protesters.