Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2025-09-15 07:00 pm
[ SECRET POST #6828 ]
⌈ Secret Post #6828 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

[Great British Menu, series 10]
__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 24 secrets from Secret Submission Post #975.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-09-15 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)It's because some people have a kink for that which is fine, actually?
Ngl it's not MY kink, but FS has a weird double standard for trans m/m porn where it's expected to be specially diverse and representative and realistic, unlike literally all the other porn out there.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-09-15 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-09-15 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-09-15 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-09-15 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-09-15 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)The way people complain about this like it's doing anything unique is the thing I find funny though. Yeah people are kinking on that aspect, and? Call me when fandom isn't doing that to some degree.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-09-16 10:19 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-09-16 10:54 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-09-16 11:04 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-09-16 11:20 am (UTC)(link)Besides, I think they're the "its stereotypes" person above which didn't mention any porn = activism stuff. If not, they sounded pretty confident explaining for OP at least.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-09-16 11:24 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-09-16 02:06 pm (UTC)(link)Thisssss, Please, for the love of satan, people, tag your shit. Stop pretending that tricking (dysphoric) people into getting jumpscared by vagina is somehow activism.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-09-16 03:15 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-09-16 09:01 am (UTC)(link)Tons of women / AFAB people tying themselves up in knots about kink and bi/gay men are out there being like hell yeah daddy/twink and bottom femboys gimme that shit.
It's super weird to me honestly.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-09-16 09:04 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-09-16 10:22 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-09-16 11:02 am (UTC)(link)Show me the last time someone on here said "butch/femme f/f porn is stereotypes" or "older man/younger woman porn is stereotypes" and ~we all know why everyone does it~. Everyone does it because they're common-ass kinks lol
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-09-16 11:09 am (UTC)(link)Personally, I think putting all porn under a microscope in terms of how realistic it is is dumb and especially when afab people agonise overly much about the realism of gay sex as is the case in fandom.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-09-16 11:13 am (UTC)(link)I am here to talk about porn, not real sex gay or otherwise
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2025-09-16 11:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2025-09-16 12:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2025-09-16 11:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2025-09-16 11:59 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2025-09-16 10:49 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-09-16 11:12 am (UTC)(link)Big dom small sub, aggro dom passive sub, older taller dom younger smaller sub is in every single porn genre of every single combo of gender enjoyed by every type of person - dommy mommy and little boys, big dominant sisters and innocent girls with crushes - but it's only in m/m that it's always deemed a moral or social issue by its fanbase so often instead of treated like a kink
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-09-16 11:18 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2025-09-16 11:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2025-09-16 11:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2025-09-16 12:13 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2025-09-16 10:48 pm (UTC)(link)Ooooooor, maybe,
1. Most M/M fans are not attracted to AFAB bodies, or are triggered by sex involving vulvas, and wish this content was at least tagged.
2. Find it telling how the vast majority of the time when a canon male character is headcanoned as AFAB, he is somehow put in a submissive or degrading role, or the *only* sex he's portrayed doing involves penetration or attention to the vagina. Yes, some trans guys do enjoy this and that's fine, but when it's the go-to context it's kind of telling what someone's subconcious social views on people with AFAB bodies are.
(FWIW, I do enjoy this content myself. But I understand the feeling of having something normalized be a major squick to you.)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-09-16 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2025-09-17 12:21 am (UTC)(link)Regarding the relevant part, yes, what you say is true. But it's also only m/m with afab people that is judged this way, m/f with afab people is not judged this way and f/f with afab people is not judged this way. The smaller and weaker woman in afab f/f is also 99% of the time the bottom and being penetrated, and in amab f/f stuff the bigger dominant woman always either the one with a dick or the one doing the penetrating and this is fine but when its m/m afab it's some kind of social or moral failing?
I understand the feeling of squick, but squicks are personal feelings you deal with on your own. People here on FS just love to make their personal squick into some kind of broad moral thing with m/m unlike every other kind of porn and it's noticeable and weird to me lol