[ SECRET POST #6834 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6834 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.
[Rayman]



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 46 secrets from Secret Submission Post #976.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

But having a child pet you as a dog because it sexually excites you IS a violation.

Same as a dom walking their sub on a leash through the grocery store while both are wearing full fetish gear is a violation. They are including people in their sexual activity.

Neither of those things even comes close to your bullshit TERF accusations. And they are both things I have personally witnessed. They’re things that within their own communities people warn against doing precisely because so many newbies think those things are ok. You can kindly go fuck yourself now. Just please don’t co-opt children or nonconsenting members of the public.

[(Anonymous)]

You did.

"It’s a violation and it’s especially gross when there are children present."

What's it a violation of? I was recently at a bar (that permanently has a portion of the proceeds go to the humane society) where they were having a furry gaming event. People brought their kids, people brought their pets, there was a suit contest, a bunch of old fogies were drinking beer and playing board games next to people dressed up as purple bears. Everyone was having a great time. It was a community event where some people were dressed up like lions and dogs and cats. What exactly was violating about that?

[(Anonymous)]

This sounds fine. Putting your boyfriend in a leash and harness and having him drink milk out of a bowl on the floor in public is odd, though.

[paperghost]

THANK YOU. Holy shit. "Public kink is like being visibly trans/gnc" is literally something that crowd loves to claim.

[(Anonymous)]

DA
I think there's two different arguments going on here, starting from the same premise.

Stance 1: Kink in public involving unwilling people is violation. Furry = always kink/sex, therefore anything furry in public is violation

Stance 2: Kink in public involving unwilling people is violation. However, furry = not always kink/sex, just like being lgbt = not always kink/sex, therefore saying "anything furry in public is violation" is the same logic as "anything lgbt in public is violation"

[paperghost]

I agree with stance 2, but you can just say that without pulling that argument out of nowhere.

[(Anonymous)]

Sort of, anon that anon is replying to is starting with Stance 1 though: https://fandomsecrets.dreamwidth.org/3279127.html?thread=1146168855#cmt1146168855

"My problem is the same with any kink that incorporates the general public. It’s a violation..." implies that furry is always kink, which the other anon is replying to with the anti-trans rhetoric comment.

But anyway, that's why it's a mess, this thread is half people who insist furry = kink and others that don't agree.

[paperghost]

I read the thread, the whole thing is a mess overall. I even commented that most of the replies missed the point of the OP's secret. I know most commenters on here are anon so I take this bullshit with a grain of salt, but it always drives me crazy when I see people parrot Republican talking points, but it's different if they frame it positively. ~I Guess~

[(Anonymous)]

No it doesn't actually imply this, the TERF whining anon WANTS it to imply this so they can get huffy about it. What is said is that people who do involve others in their kink against their will suck, and the thing this implies is that they include people in their kink at that point, not that eveyrthing they do is part of their kink.

[(Anonymous)]

Gross as it is to be in the know that a certain person is getting sexually excited by having children pet them like a dog in costume, as long as they're not making their excitement visible I am very sorry to break it to you that you are still advocating for outlawing thought crime.

I could tell you I get sexually excited by wearing sandals. Then you and you alone would have to deal with knowing that when you saw me in public wearing sandals. Because there's nothing inherently sexual about it unless you know there is for a particular person.

[(Anonymous)]

I mean, it's happened a few time at pride events where bdsm dog dudes in gimp masks and fetish wear on leash were letting little kids pet them. There are several overpublicised pictures of it as well. Not saying it happens all the time but it does happen. In general, a lot of pride parades aren't exactly kid appropriate but that's more on the parents who take their toddlers there anyway.

[(Anonymous)]

Getting off on children touching you and actively trying to make that happen is not only gross, it’s illegal. I get that you’re trying to make a point but your sandals analogy doesn’t work. If you involve children in your sexual gratification, you should be killed.

[(Anonymous)]

If it talks like a fascist....

[(Anonymous)]

Disliking pedos is fascist? I have news for you about the sexual preferences of a lot of far-right leaders.

[(Anonymous)]

Calling for the death of pedos is fascist. Because that's something fascists think is uncontroversial. And then the definition of "pedo" moves. They used to say that gays were pedos, and they probably will start soon again. And we're seeing them say that trans people are pedos. Why, those perverts get off on wearing women's clothes in public where children can see! They're using children as part of their sexual perversions!!!!!

If you call for the death of anyone, fascists will just change the definition to include their enemies. Rich white men are never pedos.

Good job feeding into it. Moron.

+1

[(Anonymous)]

thanks for pointing this out