case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2025-12-26 05:09 pm

[ SECRET POST #6930 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6930 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Zootopia 2 post-credits scene]

[Tuca and Bertie, Zootopia]



__________________________________________________



07. [SPOILERS for Danganronpa 3 and Type-NOISE: Shonen Shojo]




__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for discussion of JK Rowling, transphobia]


























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #989.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2025-12-26 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)
If canon compliant is a way to signal a specific thing in that fandom, dropping the tag would mean it would be a surprise, most likely an unhappy one for the majority of the fandom.

(Anonymous) 2025-12-26 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Tagging "canon-compliant character death" for example would make way more sense than tagging simply "canon-complaint" in general then having the cast ride off into a totally divergent adventure, though.

I'm not doubting that fandoms have adopted various tags to memetically signal things, but a fandom specifically choosing "canon compliant" with no modifiers as a signal seems more like an exception than the rule.