case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2026-03-29 12:39 pm

[ SECRET POST #7023 ]


⌈ Secret Post #7023 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.




__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 30 secrets from Secret Submission Post #1003.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
philstar22: (Default)

[personal profile] philstar22 2026-03-30 03:48 am (UTC)(link)
I just think that "objectively good writing" is a difficult thing to gage. Yes, there is a certain level of objectiveness to it, but there is also a whole lot of subjective. And I also think that these types of fans go in expecting to hate new things/things with more diverse characters and so set themselves up to hate it.

I personally think that while Star Trek Discovery does have some bad writing, for example, and I never much got into it, that Star Trek Academy is generally well written with at least a few episodes that have really good writing. But that is my personal opinion.

I also don't think there is ever going to be a whole lot of agreement on what is good vs. bad writing outside the extremes. There is general agreement usually on things that are the best and the worst, but there isn't a whole lot of agreement on anything inbetween.
Edited 2026-03-30 03:49 (UTC)