[ SECRET POST #7030 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #7030 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #1004.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Beautiful vs. ugly animation.

[(Anonymous)]

if you specifically mean anime, there's a wider middle ground than just ugly and pretty - there are artsy animations made to be very artsy, like Gankutsuo. There are absolutely trash animation done very fast and very simply for hentai - the faces are implausibly weird, the action is janky, and the only thing that ever gets passably well-animated is obviously the sex. In between is the massive gulf of gray. There are beautifully animated action scenes in the same episode of One Piece that also features the jankiest half-assed faces (Toei is notorious for padding their weekly shows with junk and saving the good animation for special scenes). A lot of short-run anime has what one would consider passable animation - it's not art, but it gets the job done in the same way that any weekly Saturday morning episode of Bugs Bunny got the job done. It's not ugly by a long shot, but it's not "beautiful."

Whatever's going on with a crappy reboot of Mononoke is an outlier even among anime, it's not a widespread thing where you can gauge pretty vs ugly on sight. Most anime is like your 80s cartoons - it works. Sometimes better, like Gummi Bears, sometimes worse, like He-Man. It's very rarely "cancel after 6 episodes" ugly, I mean they let shitty He-Man run for how long? It was the same three cells repeated over different backgrounds every episode, and yet that's somehow a classic.

Re: Beautiful vs. ugly animation.

[(Anonymous)]

There wasn't really any SatAM Bugs Bunny: that show was repackaged 40s-60s shorts with a bit of filler animation for opening and closing credits, so the shorts were *usually* better done than their contemporaries (though some of those 60s shorts, oof).

There's also a distinction between attractive/ugly character design and good/bad animation. Hanna-Barbera stuff like The Galaxy Trio or Space Ghost had some pretty neat character designs but the animation was only a step or two above Jay Ward Studios or (on bad days) Filmation.

Can't pass judgment on anime but it seems like a lot of the TV series were about as well animated (or slightly worse) than comparable Western TV series farmed out to Japanese and Korean animators. Things seem to have picked up for both in the 90s, although Western TV character designs went through some *really* weird stages (Spumco, Klasky-Czupo)...