case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2009-12-16 09:21 am

(no subject)

Because I'm getting tons of PMs and stuff about this: stuff featuring actual porn of lolicon/shota/whatever will be linked, or was supposed to be just linked, just like every other secret featuring explicit porn. But sometimes I make mistakes and a secret gets by that should have been just linked. If a secret is posted that should be linked or warned for, notify me in the name the fandom thread and I'll fix it as soon as I can.

Unfortunately, secrets about lolicon/shota will not be banned because some people think it's wrong or gross or whatever. Some people think fic about rape or gore is wrong or gross or whatever. Some people think slash is wrong or gross or whatever. I'm sure everyone agrees that actual child porn is a bad thing. Lolicon/shota is not actual child porn.

Once again, I'm sorry for letting #127 get past my radar yesterday, and will try not to let it happen again.

(Anonymous) 2009-12-16 06:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay, seriously. Guy has to code posts for 1000 secrets a week. You want to know how easy it is to make that mistake?

Here's how it would have happened if I were the one posting the secrets. First, I'd have premade html that I could just drop the secrets into and such. Which would make it even easier to make the mistake, but also easier to make posts. Then I'd just drop links in to fill out the code. After a few, I'd just be rolling merrily along. If I got interrupted... or, heck, just in a groove... it would be very easy by the 27th one to just code it the same as everything else. I have a feeling he was probably interrupted, since he's had secrets like that later on in posts and they've been coded properly.

So really, it's a small mistake. Trust me, your local government is not going to kick down your doors and haul you off to jail because you clicked on a link to a bunch of non-loli pictures and one loli picture on a site that does not exist for the express purpose of various forms of child-centric pornography. And if they do, please tell me where you live so that I never go there, buy things from there, or in any way support their economy ever again.

[identity profile] spudjuice.livejournal.com 2009-12-16 06:48 pm (UTC)(link)
And if it had been me, I would have hit the preview button before posting. Furthermore, if I knew there was an image with that content, I would have been so careful as to quadruple check it just in case. Because I'm just that paranoid and cautious.

Now, it isn't illegal in my country yet, but precedent for people being taken to court for it has been set. There is currently some controversy over the new pornography laws which will be coming into effect, because it will cover rape fantasies and adults dressed in high school uniforms. There is a fear it will result in certain harmless materials being banned.

(Anonymous) 2009-12-16 07:34 pm (UTC)(link)
You need a xanax or something.

(Anonymous) 2009-12-16 07:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh my god shut the fuck up you entitled douchebag. he made a mistake (whether it's a big one or small one), apologized, and said he'd do better in the future. if that's not good enough for your prissy ass, get the fuck out and start your own community so you can ~quadruple check~ to make sure nothing is posted that offends your ever so delicate sensibilities.

[identity profile] gershwhen.livejournal.com 2009-12-17 01:51 am (UTC)(link)
I think this sentence explains it all: Because I'm just that paranoid . Next time point that out first and we'll all ignore the rest of it.

[identity profile] fairhearing.livejournal.com 2009-12-17 09:01 am (UTC)(link)
Seriously, why are you even still here?

Go away and don't come back. Problem solved.

[identity profile] gizzybiscuits.livejournal.com 2010-01-05 01:38 pm (UTC)(link)
This.

...Seriously, I want to punt half of these twats goign UGH LETS SEE YOU DO BETTER WTF UR ALL OVERSENSITIVE ITS JUST A WIDDLE MISTAKE.