case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2026-05-30 01:21 pm

[ SECRET POST #7085 ]


⌈ Secret Post #7085 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.




__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 38 secrets from Secret Submission Post #1012.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Gimme your most controversial non-fandom take

(Anonymous) 2026-05-30 08:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Animal shelters need to euthanize animals way more. Every pregnancy should be aborted as long as they are not in active labor. Dogs should not be held more than a month. Any sign of aggression towards anything means automatic euthanasia. Too many animals in shelters to be wasting money on animals with long lists of "have to avoid in household"and the longer a dog is there, the less safe they become for a house.

Re: Gimme your most controversial non-fandom take

(Anonymous) 2026-05-30 08:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Have I got news for you LOL Shelters already do this. It’s the Humane Society who is most likely to keep aggressive dogs alive and keep them for years because they make it nearly impossible for people to adopt.

Re: Gimme your most controversial non-fandom take

(Anonymous) 2026-05-30 08:44 pm (UTC)(link)
But many rescues also just animals have litters because they are more profitable.

Re: Gimme your most controversial non-fandom take

(Anonymous) 2026-05-30 09:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Anecdote: my dog was in the shelter 7 months and returned twice before we adopted her. I think that says more about the adopters than her because we've had her going on 3 years, and she's the sweetest dog I've ever had.

Very glad she was not euthanized after a month because she's changed my life for the better, and I think she feels the same.

Re: Gimme your most controversial non-fandom take

(Anonymous) 2026-05-30 09:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Any sign of aggression towards anything means automatic euthanasia.

This one I agree with. Sure, dogs sometimes can be trained out of aggression, but a lot of times they can't, and a dog that's aggressive in any way is a potential danger. It's better not to risk it when there are already far too many non-aggressive dogs out there that need homes.

Re: Gimme your most controversial non-fandom take

(Anonymous) 2026-05-30 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I fully agree.

I also extend this to cats, and I think colonies of feral cats and stray dogs should be culled entirely, not TNR'd.

I don't think it's worth spending the time or money on dangerous, unwanted, old or disabled dogs or cats. Stop making wheels for shelter dogs and cats (it's different if they're already owned and loved by someone). There are so many perfectly healthy dogs and cats that don't have leg paralysis, and aren't 'wobbly', and don't have specific positioning needs for eating or aggression issues that need homes. Stop trying to rehabilitate reactive dogs and aggressive cats.

Spay aborts should be standard.

I love animals, but we should be realistic about how many we can responsibly rehome and no-kill shelters are ridiculous.

Re: Gimme your most controversial non-fandom take

(Anonymous) 2026-05-31 12:46 am (UTC)(link)
I'm in Australia, and every now and then someone shows up to complain that it's so awful that we just kill feral cats rather than TNR. No, we need to kill more of them. Ideally, all of them. And I say this as a loving owner of four indoor cats.

Re: Gimme your most controversial non-fandom take

(Anonymous) 2026-05-31 03:14 am (UTC)(link)
Disagree on older animals as long as they're healthy because a lot of people look specifically to adopt older pets, but agreed on the rest. There's absolutely no point in pouring resources into an animal that's going to have a much harder time getting adopted and is way more likely to be brought back than one that doesn't have any health or behavioral issues.

There already aren't enough homes for healthy, well-adjusted animals that need them, why are you just making it worse?