case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2010-01-16 04:37 pm

[ SECRET POST #1107 ]


⌈ Secret Post #1107 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

101.


__________________________________________________



102.


__________________________________________________



103.


__________________________________________________



104.


__________________________________________________



105.


__________________________________________________



106.


__________________________________________________



107.


__________________________________________________



108.


__________________________________________________



109.


__________________________________________________



110.


__________________________________________________



111.


__________________________________________________



112.


__________________________________________________



113.


__________________________________________________



114.


__________________________________________________



115.


__________________________________________________



116.


__________________________________________________



117.


__________________________________________________



118.


__________________________________________________



119.


__________________________________________________



120.


__________________________________________________



121.


__________________________________________________



122.


__________________________________________________



123.


__________________________________________________



124.


__________________________________________________



125.


__________________________________________________



126.


__________________________________________________



127.


__________________________________________________



128.


__________________________________________________



129.


__________________________________________________



130.


__________________________________________________



131.


__________________________________________________



132.


__________________________________________________



133.


__________________________________________________



134.


__________________________________________________



135.


__________________________________________________



136.


__________________________________________________



137.


__________________________________________________



138.


__________________________________________________



139.


__________________________________________________



140.


__________________________________________________



141.


__________________________________________________



142.


__________________________________________________



143.


__________________________________________________



144.


__________________________________________________



145.


__________________________________________________



146.


__________________________________________________



147.


__________________________________________________



148.


__________________________________________________



149.


__________________________________________________



150.


__________________________________________________



151.


__________________________________________________



152.


__________________________________________________



153.


__________________________________________________



154.


__________________________________________________



155.


__________________________________________________



156.


__________________________________________________



157.


__________________________________________________



158.


__________________________________________________



159.


__________________________________________________



160.


__________________________________________________



161.


__________________________________________________



162.


__________________________________________________



163.


__________________________________________________



164.


__________________________________________________



165.


__________________________________________________



166.


__________________________________________________



167.


__________________________________________________



168.


__________________________________________________



169.


__________________________________________________



170.


__________________________________________________



171.


__________________________________________________



172.


__________________________________________________



173.


__________________________________________________



174.


__________________________________________________



175.



Notes:

No need to leave comments like "HERE AGAIN SINCE IT WAS FORGOTTEN THE LAST TIME I SUBMITTED IT," please. It was not forgotten. You submitted it three times to the same submissions post.

Secrets Left to Post: 18 pages, 448 secrets from Secret Submission Post #159.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 3 4 5 - too big ], [ 1 2 - repeat ], [ 1 - take it to comments ], [ 1 2 - doing it wrong ], [ 1 - ships it ], [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 - posted twice ], [ 1 - text secret (PROTIP: YOUR SECRETS MUST GO ON AN IMAGE)], [ 1 - comment asking how to submit secrets (PROTIP: THERE IS AN FAQ)].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[identity profile] theelusiven.livejournal.com 2010-01-16 10:16 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm really trying hard to see the sexism in his Doctor Who episodes, but I keep getting crushed by Russell T. Davies' driving need to make depict every companion's mother as utterly unlikeable.

Are you referring to Coupling as a source of his sexism?

I'll give you Francine and Silvia, but...

[identity profile] softly-me.livejournal.com 2010-01-16 10:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Jackie? Unlikable? I've never encountered Jackie-hate in the fandom.

Re: I'll give you Francine and Silvia, but...

[identity profile] x-unitygirl-x.livejournal.com 2010-01-16 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)
I have. It's always rather unreasonable.

Re: I'll give you Francine and Silvia, but...

[identity profile] softly-me.livejournal.com 2010-01-16 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)
This makes me really sad. I suddenly feel the need to punch Jackie-haters in the face.

Re: I'll give you Francine and Silvia, but...

[identity profile] kotori99.livejournal.com 2010-01-17 02:18 am (UTC)(link)
I've never seen it myself, but learning now that there's Jackie-hate makes me sad too :(

Re: I'll give you Francine and Silvia, but...

[identity profile] marisahsaaaa.livejournal.com 2010-01-17 04:27 am (UTC)(link)
Fucking this. Jackie is a BAMF.
ext_10830: Jewellrey (Wibbly Wobbly)

Re: I'll give you Francine and Silvia, but...

[identity profile] glitterfairy25.livejournal.com 2010-01-17 06:53 pm (UTC)(link)
How can anyone not like Jackie? I don't even.

Re: I'll give you Francine and Silvia, but...

[identity profile] wickedground.livejournal.com 2010-01-17 06:54 pm (UTC)(link)
I think she was rather unpopular in s1 though.

(Anonymous) 2010-01-17 12:47 am (UTC)(link)
Honestly? That's one of my pet peeves. I don't think all the mothers are that unlikable. It's nice that mothers get to be more than the american stereotype that you see in cartoons. You know, with the pie cooling on the window ledge? and always there for their darling angel with a kiss and a smile and a hug. They get to be people too. Fallible and with their own problems.

Martha's mother was manipulated by the Master while obviously embroiled in a painful divorce.

Donna's mother was very fucking worried. All the time. Imagine if your daughter lived at home, didn't even try looking for a permanent job and you were the sole source of income in a household of three adults. Now imagine if that daughter isn't 20 but closer to 40 and doesn't even seem to want a career. (we know that she's looking for the Doctor but to her mother it must look like she keeps throwing perfectly good, paying, jobs out the window for no reason). If anything happened to her both Donna and Wilf would end up on the street since no one would be able to pay the bills. Personally, I think that that's way more than enough reason to be a bit of an ass about the situation. Also, again, being the sole provider in a household of three where it should be a household of two.

So yeah, I'm a bit sick of people going on about Donna's mother being horrible. and very tired of the idea that mothers should be supportive (in the positive and kind and smiling sense) 100% of the time regardless of what troubles they might be going through. Grow up a bit.
ext_52635: (Default)

[identity profile] mekkio.livejournal.com 2010-01-17 01:48 am (UTC)(link)
I am more worried about the fact that RTD always makes broken homes for his companions. Rose's dad is dead. Martha's parents are divorced. Donna's dad is MIA or is he dead? I don't think they give a really clear answer. RTD's like the British version of Disney.

(Anonymous) 2010-01-17 03:17 am (UTC)(link)
Only happily married people with 2.5 kids and a dog and a house in the suburbs should be on television! Anything else is just unrealistic.

Er.
ext_52635: (Default)

[identity profile] mekkio.livejournal.com 2010-01-17 03:25 am (UTC)(link)
One companion coming from a broken home is no big deal. Every new companion in the New Who coming from a broken home sends up red flags. Just like one orphan in a Disney movie is no big deal. Every other Disney hero missing a parent or having none at all is a big deal.

Yeah, try to twist that, troll. It's not working.

(Anonymous) 2010-01-17 04:30 am (UTC)(link)
Red flags that represent the danger of... what, exactly?

I might agree that RTD has overused "missing parent/parents" as a character trait for several of his protagonists, but I'm not sure it represents anything more than his tendency to overuse anything that worked well the first time! Besides, I think RTD was careful to show the love and strength of these "nontraditional" families. Rose and Jackie, Mickey and his gran (but definitely not his mum, you're right on that,) both had a lot of love, affection and trust. Donna's father was barely mentioned, but she did have a strong and stable father-figure in Wilf. Martha's family was a big, arguing mess of people that still adored one another, which I found so true to life. While these companions' homes were not of the "two happily married parents" variety, I would hesitate to call them broken.
ext_52635: (Default)

[identity profile] mekkio.livejournal.com 2010-01-17 04:52 am (UTC)(link)
Red flags that represent the danger of... what, exactly?

Red flags don't always mean "danger". They mean "be aware". As in, "look, this is RTD's trend."

And I have no problem with RTD's families. I simply think it's odd that ALL of the companions he has written for come from households that did not have two parents. Be it a mother and father or a mother and mother or a father and father. It's always one parent is missing and usually made up by a different relative, non-relative or no one at all.

Why is that?
ext_52635: (Default)

[identity profile] mekkio.livejournal.com 2010-01-17 03:28 am (UTC)(link)
Hey, you just reminded me that Mickey, another companion, was raised without a mom and dad as well but by his grandmother. Which only solidifies my theory.

Thanks!

(Anonymous) 2010-01-17 10:51 am (UTC)(link)
And Jack lost his father as a child.

[identity profile] angathol.livejournal.com 2010-01-17 03:47 am (UTC)(link)
To play devil's advocate for a moment: generally it's easier for someone to go off on adventures in fiction if they don't have too many ties back to home, hence why most male heroes are orphans or only have one parent. If they had a complete, loving family, they probably wouldn't feel the need to escape and seek adventure, or wouldn't want to.

(Anonymous) 2010-01-17 04:20 am (UTC)(link)
I quite agree. It's a common and effective trope, that's why Disney uses it. The fairy tales and novels they base their films on feature a number of dead mothers (Cinderella, Snow White, Beauty and the Beast) and orphans (Oliver Twist/Oliver & Company, The Sword in the Stone, The Jungle Book, Tarzan) and it's hardly a storytelling device invented by the House of Mouse.

[identity profile] dweo.livejournal.com 2010-01-17 11:43 am (UTC)(link)
Donna's father died, but that wasn't actually RTD's fault. The actor who played Donna's father died while filming series 4. That is why they got Wilf to take his place. So blaming RTD for the lack of Donna's father is rather unfair.

[identity profile] ombredelarue.livejournal.com 2010-01-17 02:13 am (UTC)(link)
Yes yes thrice yes (to your first point)! I was watching 'Journey's End', and it really bugged me how the Doctor told Jackie not to touch anything on the TARDIS, when she could evidently jump between parallel universes without a technical hiccup. It's sort of like, "Hurr durr humour needed, what can we do? Oh, I know! The Sci-Fi equivalent of mother-in-law jokes." Grumble grumble.

[identity profile] theelusiven.livejournal.com 2010-01-17 02:22 am (UTC)(link)
This was my point exactly--the Doctor acts like a jerk to all the Companions' mothers because they have perfectly rational concerns about their daughters picking up, flying off with a space alien, and possibly dying. It's like RTD expects these people's parents to just let them fly free with no concern whatsoever at age 18.

[identity profile] scarlet-carsons.livejournal.com 2010-01-17 02:38 pm (UTC)(link)
People dislike Jackie? Nooooooo. :(