Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2010-03-23 04:32 pm
[ SECRET POST #1174 ]
⌈ Secret Post #1174 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
101.

__________________________________________________
102.

__________________________________________________
103.

__________________________________________________
104.

__________________________________________________
105.

__________________________________________________
106.

__________________________________________________
107.

__________________________________________________
108.

__________________________________________________
109.

__________________________________________________
110.

__________________________________________________
111.

__________________________________________________
112.

__________________________________________________
113.

__________________________________________________
114.

__________________________________________________
115.

__________________________________________________
116.

__________________________________________________
117.

__________________________________________________
118.

__________________________________________________
119.

__________________________________________________
120.

__________________________________________________
121.

__________________________________________________
122.

__________________________________________________
123.

__________________________________________________
124.

__________________________________________________
125.

__________________________________________________
126.

__________________________________________________
127.

__________________________________________________
128.

__________________________________________________
129.

__________________________________________________
130.

__________________________________________________
131.

__________________________________________________
132.

__________________________________________________
133.

__________________________________________________
134.

__________________________________________________
135.

__________________________________________________
136.

__________________________________________________
137.

__________________________________________________
138.

__________________________________________________
139.

__________________________________________________
140.

__________________________________________________
141.

__________________________________________________
142.

__________________________________________________
143.

__________________________________________________
144.

__________________________________________________
145.

__________________________________________________
146.

__________________________________________________
147.

__________________________________________________
148.

__________________________________________________
149.

__________________________________________________
150.

__________________________________________________
151.

__________________________________________________
152.

__________________________________________________
153.

__________________________________________________
154.

__________________________________________________
155.

__________________________________________________
156.

__________________________________________________
157.

Notes:
April 1st Submissions Post is open!
Secrets Left to Post: 08 pages, 185 secrets from Secret Submission Post #168.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: 147
Thanks for letting me know. Sorry if I sounded insensitive/like a jerkass before. /: But wow, and here I thought OP was just being a jerkass by ragging on her weight. Nice to know that he/she is not only a jerkass, but a racist jerkass to boot. xP
Re: 147
(Anonymous) 2010-03-23 10:43 pm (UTC)(link)We can both agree on the OP, though. Yikes.
Re: 147
Regarding the actual secret. I haven't seen anyone glorify her weight, OP. Saying someone is pretty and/or a good actress doesn't mean that she couldn't be healthier. Do you expect them to say "Oh what a fatty!" every time she's mentioned? I certainly hope not.
Re: 147
(Anonymous) 2010-03-23 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)Re: 147
(Anonymous) 2010-03-23 11:05 pm (UTC)(link)I did not know spade" was racist, neither did numerous people in this thread and I find it SICKENING that people are reinforcing it as a racist term...and others (you) are just letting it happen.
Re: 147
(Anonymous) 2010-03-23 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)Re: 147
(Anonymous) 2010-03-24 12:50 am (UTC)(link)Re: 147
Different words have different connotations depending on where you go. For instance, in England "fag" means cigarette and isn't used as a derogatory term toward homosexuals at all. That doesn't mean that it's not a slur in America. I'd never heard "spade" used as a slur before, but that doesn't mean that it's not a slur in other areas -- and who says that the OP didn't know that it was? If this was a non-offensive secret to begin with, I'd have more faith in the OP, but given the fact that the OP was already acting like a jerkass, I have little reason to give the OP the benefit of the doubt.
Re: 147
(Anonymous) 2010-03-24 12:55 am (UTC)(link)How on earth was OP acting like a jackass? Their secret was dead on. Nice girl, nice actress, not the best weight role-model for little girls, and the kudos for being heavy is baffling. You could use some reading comprehension
Re: 147
OP was acting like a jerkass because the secret said nothing about it being a "weight-specific" role model. Instead, OP said that the actress was not a good role model for little girls because of her weight. Being a role model has nothing to do with that. Being a role model instead has to do with who you are and what you do. If this actress is a kind person and if this actress is successful, then yes, this actress is a perfectly good role model for young kids. It doesn't matter what she looks like or what her weight is, except -- as others have pointed out -- to prove that you don't need to meet the Hollywood norm of "beautiful" in order to succeed.
As for her weight, you know what? I don't know who that actress is, and I'm probably not going to go look into her work any time soon because that's just not the type of thing that interests me. But looking at that picture? I think she's beautiful, and it doesn't really matter what you think or say. Kudos to her not for "being heavy" (though I honestly don't have a problem with that; I'm not so shallow as to think that outer appearance is what makes a person), but for being comfortable in her own skin and putting herself out there despite the very obvious bias in Hollywood and in general society against people of heavier weight.
And no, before you say anything, I am not overweight. Actually, I'm underweight, despite my decidedly unhealthy eating habits (my main diet consists of ice cream, cookies, bagels with Nutella, and other sweet things). I just really don't have a tolerance for shallow, ignorant cowards who have nothing better to do than criticize others for their weight and then needlessly insult those who don't share the same opinion.
In other words, anon? This conversation is finished, especially since you apparently don't have the courage to back up your comments by logging in to your account. Show some spine next time.
Re: 147
(Anonymous) 2010-03-24 10:02 am (UTC)(link)I don't think the point is that ignorance is good, and learning is bad, but in this case what you're "learning" is to be offended by something that is not offensive on the surface, has no offensive undertones, and (to the best of our knowledge) was not intended to be offensive. It's one thing to call someone ignorant for not knowing that a word is used as/originated as a racial slur, it's quite another to insist that they stop using perfectly innocuous phrases because someone may misunderstand and be offended.
Also, I'm not logged into an lj account because I honestly don't have one, and don't see the point in getting one just to prove to fandom!secrets that I'm not a coward (whatever that means).
Re: 147
But if you'd look up the comment thread, you'd see that not only did this original anon jump in by calling me an idiot (no, I'm not b'awwing, just pointing out that it's not as if I'm the one that started this argument), but also insinuated that "because I didn't know it was a slur, it must not be one." That's a logical fallacy. Just because you don't know something's offensive doesn't mean it isn't, and all it DOES mean is that A) you should be more careful about where you use said phrase from now on, and B) there is the possibility that the OP DID know, given the fact that other users on LJ did.
I never said the person should stop using that phrase. All I said is that there is a distinct possibility that the OP knew the other meaning. Original!Anon was the one who started in by getting EXTREMELY defensive and aggressive for no apparent reason, even after I tried to be nice.
And for the record? Saying "Wrong again about ignorance" after I quite clearly say that it's fine to be ignorant but not fine to be complacent in ignorance is pretty much saying "ignorance good, learning bad."
Re: 147