case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2010-05-11 08:40 pm

[ SECRET POST #1225 ]


⌈ Secret Post #1225 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

101.


__________________________________________________



102.


__________________________________________________



103.


__________________________________________________



104.


__________________________________________________



105.


__________________________________________________



106.


__________________________________________________



107.


__________________________________________________



108.


__________________________________________________



109.


__________________________________________________



110.


__________________________________________________



111.


__________________________________________________



112.


__________________________________________________



113.


__________________________________________________



114.


__________________________________________________



115.


__________________________________________________



116.


__________________________________________________



117.


__________________________________________________



118.


__________________________________________________



119.


__________________________________________________



120.


__________________________________________________



121.


__________________________________________________



122.


__________________________________________________



123.


__________________________________________________



124.


__________________________________________________



125.


__________________________________________________



126.


__________________________________________________



127.


__________________________________________________



128.


__________________________________________________



129.


__________________________________________________



130.


__________________________________________________



131.


__________________________________________________



132.


__________________________________________________



133.


__________________________________________________



134.


__________________________________________________



135.


__________________________________________________



136.


__________________________________________________



137.


__________________________________________________



138.


__________________________________________________



139.


__________________________________________________



140.


__________________________________________________



141.


__________________________________________________



142.


__________________________________________________



143.


__________________________________________________



144.


__________________________________________________



145.


__________________________________________________



146.


__________________________________________________



147.


__________________________________________________



148.


__________________________________________________



149.


__________________________________________________



150.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: ?? pages, ??? secrets from Secret Submission Post #175.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

101, 102, 111, 115, 131, 135, 143, 146, 147, 150

[identity profile] velvet-mace.livejournal.com 2010-05-12 02:24 am (UTC)(link)
101) Eh, I wouldn't stress it, at least you have a reliable form of inspiration. Mine comes from all over the place so when it's not there, I have no clue where to look for it.

102) Canon may be too great to inspire people to write. I know for me, if canon more or less covers it, I'm generally not inspired to write about it.

111) I'll just let you know, I absolutely loathe it when people spam a forum with random crap. That has got to be the most selfish, petty, attention whoring solution you could possibly come up with. It's far worse than correcting a person's spelling mistakes, which has some actual merit and many people appreciate. Most communities I belong to consider what you are doing a bannable offense it's that obnoxious.

If you don't care to know when this chick writes a new fic -- tell her. Politely. Via PM. Otherwise, let other authors fight their own fights. Don't drag fandom into your petty snit.

115) You are clearly insane.

131) LOL

135) I never found K-pop to be emotionally stirring in lyric or tune and without that, there's really no point in listening. But ya know what? No one has ever gotten on my back for not listening to it. And yes, I have people on my f-list, and friends even, who love the stuff. The trick is to not try to convince anyone else that they shouldn't like what they like just because you don't. That's obnoxious.

143) The only times I see people asking for the fandom, it's quite relevant and was usually left out as a tease.

146) Oh yes, I love Isaac Asimov! Baley was a total sweetheart. He totally doesn't deserve the things I've fantasized happening to him.

147) I didn't get involved in fandom until after I'd had my children. Fandom is one of the few hobbies you can indulge in with a bitty baby, since you can do it at home, at any hour, while nursing.

150) Yeah, pretty much.

Wow, I look so wordy.
Edited 2010-05-12 02:31 (UTC)

Re: 101, 102, 111, 115, 131, 135, 140, 143, 147, 150

[identity profile] dorknessrising.livejournal.com 2010-05-12 02:35 am (UTC)(link)
150) Yeah, pretty much.

Agreed. It saddens me that the OP felt this needed to be a secret. Just because the people you're hurting lack a face shouldn't make it suddenly okay to pick on them.

Re: 101, 102, 111, 115, 131, 135, 143, 146, 147, 150

[identity profile] martoufmarty.livejournal.com 2010-05-12 03:16 am (UTC)(link)
135 - Exactly! It's not original or inspiring, but to me it's entertaining and fun - which is the whole point of pop music!

(Sorry! It's late and I read it slightly wrong, thus the edit)
Edited 2010-05-12 03:17 (UTC)

146 OP here :)

(Anonymous) 2010-05-12 03:59 am (UTC)(link)
eee, I wasn't expecting anyone to actually recognize the series, let alone comment :D
He was! and I know what you mean, my favorite part is that one bit from Robots of Dawn where they have to take a hovercar through this huge storm, and Baley just completely freaks out (all my favorite bits were the ones that dealt with his agoraphobia, actually. I'm terrible xD)

Re: 146 OP here :)

[identity profile] velvet-mace.livejournal.com 2010-05-12 04:15 am (UTC)(link)
Really? Asimov is one of the greats of science fiction. I have tons of his books. The caves of steel series and the foundation series are both great. Foundation in particular has moments where your jaw just drops. I Robot has some good short stories in it. Murder at the ABBA is fun because he includes himself and his friends as background characters.

I'm rather fond of his robots because they manage to such sweet, polite and helpful obstructionists. There's nothing quite like being protected to death.

Re: 146 OP here :)

(Anonymous) 2010-05-12 10:40 am (UTC)(link)
I've only ever met one other person over the internet who's a fan of Asimov, though I guess I must just be looking in the wrong places or something xD
Admittedly, I haven't read any of the short stories, just the series. I know we have them sitting around here somewhere though, I'll probably pick them up at some point.
Aah yeah, Foundation had some great surprising moments - my Dad actually kind of spoiled me for the ending though, I spent the entire Foundation waiting for Daneel to show up because Dad told me he was really important.

Re: 146 OP here :)

[identity profile] velvet-mace.livejournal.com 2010-05-12 03:13 pm (UTC)(link)
You're dad's an ass!

The original Foundation series was written before the Caves of Steel! Of course there wasn't any Daneel in it. Daneel's involvement in the later Foundation book was Asimov's retconning to make his two (previously independent) universes jive.

I actually prefer the original trilogy over the later books in the series because the focus was on the story that was being told rather than trying to include favorites from other novels. The later stories hold up as world-building but aren't as compelling to me in plot and the characters seemed weaker and less interesting.
meadowphoenix: (Default)

Re: 101, 102, 111, 115, 131, 135, 143, 146, 147, 150

[personal profile] meadowphoenix 2010-05-12 07:51 am (UTC)(link)
115) You are clearly insane.

Do you mean that...sarcastically? Or do you think you can make that statement because what you think of a person you've probably never met totally invalidates whatever anybody else thinks of a person they've probably never met. JSYK, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Re: 101, 102, 111, 115, 131, 135, 143, 146, 147, 150

[identity profile] velvet-mace.livejournal.com 2010-05-12 02:45 pm (UTC)(link)
There's a lot of glorification of him now that he's dead, but no, he's not physically attractive with his nose rotting off and his hair lank, his skin pasty, his emaciated body. Now back in his heyday, he was a very attractive man, but his looks went to wack -- in large part because of his own habits and eccentricities rather than in problems he couldn't control, like vitiligo.

As for his "Inner beauty" he was Howard Hughes-esque -- firing anyone who didn't totally agree with him, no matter how self-destructive his wants were, living outside his means, not because he didn't have much of an income, but rather because he never, ever set any limits on himself. He was not particularly nice to anyone. He was the ultimate spoiled selfish brat.

And that's not getting into his creepiness with kids and bizarre parenting.

I really don't get that you see "beauty" in him. He was an awful person, who surrounded himself with people who cared only about being paid, drove away anyone who cared, and reaped the consequences in spades.
meadowphoenix: (Default)

Re: 101, 102, 111, 115, 131, 135, 143, 146, 147, 150

[personal profile] meadowphoenix 2010-05-12 06:15 pm (UTC)(link)
So the answer is yes, whatever you think of a person you've probably never met totally invalidates whatever anybody else thinks of them, and gives you the right to question their mental health. Thought so.

My mother has lupus, which he also had along with vitiligo, so I'm gonna call Bull. She doesn't have a version that is life-threatening (immediately anyway), and she takes her meds, but right now, she looks like she has two black eyes, simply from stress. If I was a performer, then I'd do something to even out my skin tone, because looks is part of how money is made. I'm pretty sure he was right in that people would be less disgusted to think he wanted to be white, than to think he had skin problems. I didn't like the plastic surgery, but that's mostly he nose, so. Also, in the pictures I've seen recently, he looks quite healthy, which is all I require for beauty.

Since you know everyone he's met, I'm sure you can make that blanket statement on how nice he was. Or, you know, not. As far as firing people, when it came to artistic directions, he was a genius. If they thought he was making a bad artistic decision, then chances are they were wrong. When it comes to business or personal motivations, he was fucked up, which is generally what child stardom will do for you. An honest look at the rest of his family will tell you they're all fucked up, with a lot less money (except for the oldest sister, and that's mostly because she wasn't really in show business until she was older). I am going to blame 40% of that on the father. And yeah, he was so spoiled, he somehow got in the guinness book of world records for how much money he's given to charity. Those selfish brats, always thinking of themselves.

I give him mad props as an artist, for wanting to learn the business when he was young, and for generally giving his fans what they wanted. Few child artists do that. I don't personally think he drove away everyone who cared, because when you're a star, the only people who are probably going to truly care are your family. I've got no evidence that he drove them away, considering he worked on their records, and they on his a ton and they were thinking of a reality show.

I won't deny the bad business decision making. But not listening to people who don't agree with you, and not setting limits on yourself don't make you an awful person. Unless you think most people are awful, but with a lot less money.

Most of all though: YOU DON'T KNOW HIM, so making personal judgments and then insulting other people who make different judgments, does not reflect well, at the very least, on you self-awareness. I do find that there is a correlation between a lack of self-awareness and awfulness, though.

Re: 101, 102, 111, 115, 131, 135, 143, 146, 147, 150

[identity profile] velvet-mace.livejournal.com 2010-05-12 06:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Wow. Okay then. But I'll make 2 points.

1) Your mom isn't Michael Jackson

2) Not listening to anyone other than yourself and doing whatever the hell you want to regardless of the consequences does indeed makes you a spoiled brat even if you don't have money.
meadowphoenix: (Default)

Re: 101, 102, 111, 115, 131, 135, 143, 146, 147, 150

[personal profile] meadowphoenix 2010-05-12 10:05 pm (UTC)(link)
1) You're right of course, my mother isn't Michael Jackson. My point however was that you were making judgments on something you know nothing about. And then were completely dismissive of other people's thoughts about it, as if your judgments was all that was authoritative. As I said, it indicates a lack of self awareness.

2)I don't agree with your definition of spoiled brat at all, nor do I think you were involved in his personal life enough to know how he made decisions. Your definition encompasses a lot of people, including I would say most Americans who bought a house they couldn't pay for, and all of those Greeks who decided they didn't want to pay taxes. I wouldn't call them spoiled brats. The word specifically has to do with being unable to accept the word no because people saying no is unfamiliar. Considering his childhood, that appellation is incorrect.

Re: 101, 102, 111, 115, 131, 135, 143, 146, 147, 150

[identity profile] velvet-mace.livejournal.com 2010-05-12 10:39 pm (UTC)(link)
1) A lack of self-awareness? Seriously? I don't think that word means what you think it does. But if by this you mean that I should not be incredulous of people who say things that are patently the opposite of all evidence, I disagree. The OP hasn't earned any of my respect with hers.

2) I wondered when you'd get around to suggesting his childhood excuses his behavior. Spoiling can happen at any age. It's caused by a lack of discipline and reasonable consistantly enforced rules. Punishment and discipline aren't the same thing. As a child he may have been abused, but that doesn't give him the right, as an adult, to do whatever the hell he wants. No he as an adult man should not be having sleepovers with underaged boys. Everyone in that household knew he shouldn't. He chose to ignore advice and do it anyway. He got rid of doctors who told him what he didn't want to hear, and got himself a doctor who would allow him to abuse drugs. He got rid of the plastic surgeons that said "no" to the surgeries that ultimately destroyed his looks. He showed absolutely no financial restraint. He attempted to buy John Merirks remains and was thwarted because he damn well had no reason for having them.

Leave the Greeks and homeowners out of this. The homeowners wasn't caused by individual overreaching, but rather a pervasive flaw with the entire system that baffled even economists and trapped even savvy homeowners. The greek government didn't pursue tax cheats and the problem mushroomed. There's plenty of blame to be had there, but it wasn't a matter of individual discipline.
meadowphoenix: (Default)

Re: 101, 102, 111, 115, 131, 135, 143, 146, 147, 150

[personal profile] meadowphoenix 2010-05-13 05:47 am (UTC)(link)
1) Irrationally deriding others for what you think is an irrational opinion, while refusing to believe that anything you say is an opinion and not fact=lack of self-awareness, at least. Note: what you say is an opinion because you have to interpret the facts and assume things to get to your "evidence." You have no personal experience. This is why hearsay is not allowed in American courts.

2)Don't derail the argument with assumptions. I never said his childhood excused his behavior. I said that spoiled brat is not the correct term, because of his childhood. You could've have used another more appropriate term. You didn't. I don't think spoiling can happen at any age, since neurologically that's not how decision making works. Nor do I think thinking you know better than everyone is spoiled behavior. I think it's superior behavior, but not spoiled. You could just as easily say he was single-minded. According to your definition on spoiled, those people were spoiled: they didn't listen to good advice, and refused to consider the consequences. That's your def, not mine. Yes, there is plenty of blame, especially on the economic and political systems that fatally augmented the collective lack of individual discipline. If you pay your taxes, which is pretty much the only way the government makes money, there is no problem to mushroom. If you were denied a mortgage before, and nothing's changed, know that the reason you were denied before was that people thought you couldn't pay for the house, and be a little suspicious of why someone is giving you a house now, when prices have risen. Just because the government and banks played enablers, doesn't mean the problem didn't have a lot to do with people ignoring the consequences of their decisions.

Frankly, we can agree to disagree on what makes someone spoiled. I think you're wrong, you think I'm wrong, whatever. My point still remains that you seem to think your opinion is fact. You question the mental state of someone who also has an opinion, and think this is a rational response. Insist that it's a rational response, although it's quite irrational. This makes you unaware of your self, if not other things.

Re: 101, 102, 111, 115, 131, 135, 143, 146, 147, 150

[identity profile] dorknessrising.livejournal.com 2010-05-14 03:23 am (UTC)(link)
My point still remains that you seem to think your opinion is fact. You question the mental state of someone who also has an opinion, and think this is a rational response. Insist that it's a rational response, although it's quite irrational. This makes you unaware of your self, if not other things.

Can I fangirl you for putting that far more eloquently than I could have?
meadowphoenix: (Default)

Re: 101, 102, 111, 115, 131, 135, 143, 146, 147, 150

[personal profile] meadowphoenix 2010-05-14 04:44 am (UTC)(link)
:giggles: Oh my! :fans herself nervously: I've never had a fangirl before. Maybe we should start an eloquence fandom? Saving the internet, one post at a time!