ext_278733 ([identity profile] grayout.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-05-27 06:00 pm

[ SECRET POST #142 ]


⌈ Secret Post #142 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 120 secrets from Secret Submission Post #021.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Monday, May 28th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: Here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[identity profile] lostremnant.livejournal.com 2007-05-28 04:29 am (UTC)(link)
My definition of Mary Sue comes from Star Trek fan fiction of years ago, where the definition was a self insertion of the author in the story as a character who was beautiful and perfect and usually had a love interest with whatever character the author had a crush on.

These days people seem to think that a Mary Sue is any female character who is strong and able to take care of herself instead of being a pathetic woeful damsel in distress who always needs the male hero to rescue her. I don't agree with that definition.

[identity profile] klytaemnestra.livejournal.com 2007-05-28 04:40 am (UTC)(link)

That's my definition,as well.

Yeah, I hate seeing how every other female character is a 'Mary Sue'. I hate self inserts ... but what I hate more is this trend of calling all these female characters Mary Sues because they actually can do stuff, or have problems ... or whatever. I keep seeing, 'Blah blah Elizabeth Swann is a Mary Sue.' Oh really now? If so, what the fuck does that make Jack Sparrow or fucking Will Turner? But no, because they have a penis stupid fanpersons believe they can do no wrong.