[ SECRET POST #144 ]

[shahni.livejournal.com]

⌈ Secret Post #144 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.




Notes:

- Con returnee is happy and sleepy. Thus you get early post!

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 75 secrets from Secret Submission Post #021.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Wednesday, May 30th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: Here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[byewonderland.livejournal.com]

I think everyone has their preference, but it's a lot nicer to see people just not get all huffy-stabbity over it. :D It's not like we're being paid to promote pairings. :B

[shahni.livejournal.com]

I love you both for being good fans who don't count on pairings to make a fandom.

[byewonderland.livejournal.com]

If pairings were the only thing that mattered in fandoms, I think a lot of this would have all gone straight to h-e-double-hockey stick ages ago. D:

[shahni.livejournal.com]

Unfortunately for some people, they ARE all that matter, so. Go figure.

I personally count on character personalities and how well they go with their designs and environment. :3 ThatmadesenseIhope.

[byewonderland.livejournal.com]

If people want that then they should stick to soap operas or something - pairings are really all that matter in those shows.

It does make sense! That's pretty much what I look for. And especially, I really keep an eye on character interactions. When there is a variety of character relationships [and this ranges from sibling to friends to even enemies] it tends to appeal to me more then if it's only romance, romance and more romance.

[dots.livejournal.com]

The pairing bullshit is one reason I left one of my old fandoms years ago. All people ever talked about was pairings, and the wars that ensued from that ruined the fandom for me completely.