Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2011-03-26 04:07 pm
[ SECRET POST #1544 ]
⌈ Secret Post #1544 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
21.

__________________________________________________
22.

__________________________________________________
23. [TRIGGER WARNING for sexual abuse]

__________________________________________________
24.

__________________________________________________
25.

__________________________________________________
26.

__________________________________________________
27.

__________________________________________________
28.

__________________________________________________
29.

__________________________________________________
30.

__________________________________________________
31.

__________________________________________________
32.

__________________________________________________
33.

__________________________________________________
34.

__________________________________________________
35.

__________________________________________________
36.

__________________________________________________
37.

__________________________________________________
38.

__________________________________________________
39.

__________________________________________________
40. [tb]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 12 pages, 286 secrets from Secret Submission Post #221.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 1 2 - repeat ], [ 1 - omfg use .png ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-03-26 08:34 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-03-26 08:37 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-03-26 08:43 pm (UTC)(link)Congrats anon. You are now a fundamentalist.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-03-26 08:53 pm (UTC)(link)I will call out hateful, hurtful behavior. I do not treat others as second-class citizens or support that treatment in law. You are trying to make two completely different things equitable, and you're showing yourself to be very simple and privileged in the attempt.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-03-26 08:55 pm (UTC)(link)I say this as a nonreligious person.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-03-26 08:59 pm (UTC)(link)Also, see my point about other Christians, those wonderful "good" Christians everyone's going on about, calling out the shitty behavior of those they supposedly share a religion with. If they don't shout that shit down, what good are they?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-26 21:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-27 00:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-27 10:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-03-26 09:04 pm (UTC)(link)Fundamentalism is not restricted to supporting that sort of treatment through legal actions. It is also the blatant intolerance that stems from any person, of ANY cultural denomination. If you support intolerance towards a group of people, while painting them all with the same, negative brush, then yes, in my eyes, you are a fundamentalist.
no subject
IAWTC
(Anonymous) 2011-03-27 03:43 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-03-26 08:53 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-03-26 08:49 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
touche, anon
different anon
(Anonymous) 2011-03-26 09:03 pm (UTC)(link)See, a mugger is an accidental property of some black person. It's not a part of what defines the term "black person".
Hatefulness is an essential property of a "hateful religion". A hateful religion is hateful by definition, and people who are willingly a part of that religion, while they themselves aren't necessarily hateful, should be ashamed of willingly associating themselves with something that is.
Re: different anon
(Anonymous) 2011-03-26 09:29 pm (UTC)(link)anyone who has any simple kind of understanding of history, US in particular, can see that
Re: different anon
(Anonymous) 2011-03-26 09:51 pm (UTC)(link)It's when people start saying all religions are hateful that the real problem starts...
Sorry if this posts twice, my connection is not very cooperative today. :/
Re: different anon
(Anonymous) 2011-03-27 12:39 am (UTC)(link)Except that hatefulness is not an inherent property of Christianity. Quite the contrary in fact: Christ Himself taught only about loving and forgiving everyone. So by equating Christianity with the hateful bits of it, you are effectively doing the same as equating blackness of skin with Black muggers. Congrats.
Re: different anon
(Anonymous) 2011-03-27 01:03 am (UTC)(link)Some anon said: "I don't think it's a problem that people who belong to hateful religions feel ashamed. I think it's great."
and that's what I replied to, Christianity was not mentioned.
Explaining that, the question of whether Christianity is hateful becomes completely off-topic to the discussion, but just for the record, I do think Christianity is evidently a hateful religion. It's hateful toward promiscuous women, hateful to-... to be honest, I'm not in the mood to list all the groups it's hateful towards. Its hatefulness to certain groups of people is undeniably a part of it, not just as a hatefulness of some of its members, but as an intrinsical part of its doctrine (see: any page of the Bible).
Re: different anon
(Anonymous) 2011-03-27 01:13 am (UTC)(link)Also: go ahead and show me a teaching of Christ Himself that was hateful. No, really, I'm serious.
Re: different anon
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-27 01:27 (UTC) - ExpandRe: different anon
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-27 01:42 (UTC) - ExpandRe: different anon
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-28 19:39 (UTC) - ExpandRe: different anon
Re: different anon
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-27 05:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: different anon
Re: different anon
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-27 06:38 (UTC) - ExpandRe: different anon
Re: different anon
New Anon
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-27 06:51 (UTC) - ExpandRe: New Anon
Re: New Anon
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-27 08:09 (UTC) - ExpandRe: New Anon
Re: different anon
Re: different anon
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-27 10:19 (UTC) - ExpandRe: different anon
(Anonymous) 2011-03-27 01:21 am (UTC)(link)"by equating Christianity with the hateful bits of it, you are effectively doing the same as equating blackness of skin with Black muggers"
No, just no.
In order to proclaim Christianity "hateful" it doesn't have to be consisted only of "hatefulness". If bits of it are hateful (depending how significant you deem those bits), you can call the thing as a whole hateful.
The same way, to proclaim Black person a mugger, "bits of them" have to be a mugger. I mean, they have had to, at some point, mug someone. Now, how much mugging there has to be (someone stealing a wallet once is different from someone mugging for a living) before someone's a "mugger" is debatable (the same way how how much hating has to be done before something's "hateful" is debatable), but what's sure is that there has to be mugging in order for someone to be a mugger (which obviously isn't the case with all the Black people).
Re: different anon
(Anonymous) 2011-03-27 01:34 am (UTC)(link)So now, by your reasoning, since there ARE Black muggers, it IS acceptable to consider that Black people in general are muggers... See where the problem is?
Inversely, if you want to compare oranges to oranges, then you need to compare ONE random Christian to ONE random Black person. Just like there's no telling if the Black person is a mugger just because they are Black, there is also no telling if the Christian is hateful just because they are Christian. Simple, really.
Re: different anon
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-27 11:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: different anon
(Anonymous) 2011-03-28 07:37 pm (UTC)(link)Just sayin'
Re: different anon
no subject
no subject