Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2011-04-05 03:54 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
[ SECRET POST #1554 ]
⌈ Secret Post #1554 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Knut The Polar Bear]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Invader Zim]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Can't Hardly Wait]
__________________________________________________
05.
[Arthur C. Clarke's Odyssey series]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Robert Knepper/Prison Break]
__________________________________________________
07.

[The Prophecy, Christopher Walken]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Skins]
__________________________________________________
09.

[In a Fix, on TLC]
__________________________________________________
10.

[UK TV/Radio]
__________________________________________________
11.

[Homestuck and Puella Magi Madoka Magica]
__________________________________________________
12.

[Shameless US]
__________________________________________________
13.

[Young Justice]
__________________________________________________
14.

[Rose of Versailles]
__________________________________________________
15.

[Dr. Horrible]
__________________________________________________
16.

[Tangled]
__________________________________________________
17.

[Homestuck]
__________________________________________________
18.

[Severus Snape/Lolita KompleX]
__________________________________________________
19.

[Alien loves Predator]
__________________________________________________
20.

[TFL]
__________________________________________________
21.

[Regular Show]
__________________________________________________
22.

[Summer Wars]
__________________________________________________
23.

[Glee]
__________________________________________________
24.

[Ace Attorney]
__________________________________________________
25.

[Buffy the Vampire Slayer]
__________________________________________________
26.

[Fringe]
__________________________________________________
27.

[k-pop]
__________________________________________________
28.

[Stargate SG1, Legend of the Seeker, Rizzoli & Isles]
__________________________________________________
29.

[Sailor Moon]
__________________________________________________
30.

[The Spoony Experiment]
__________________________________________________
31.

[MSLN]
__________________________________________________
32.

[Todd In The Shadows/Infomania]
__________________________________________________
33.

[Roman Polanski and Woody Allen]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 120 secrets from Secret Submission Post #222.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 3 4 5 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ], [ 1 - not English ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
no subject
[Buffy the Vampire Slayer]
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-04-05 08:06 pm (UTC)(link)This rule is taught by anyone taking social equality 101 because it means that no one is forced into a category they don't like.
You might very well be bisexual, but if you identify as lesbian you must be respected as such.
I know this rule sounds strange, but if you think about it, it's a patch on a system which is already broken - the fact that anyone is judged for their sexuality or race or mental ability or anything.
It took a while for my scientific brain to get my head around it too, OP, but it's a fix to a big problem and, on the whole, is way less harmful than making someone something they're not happy with.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-04-05 20:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-04-05 20:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-04-05 08:11 pm (UTC)(link)And I agree, I think Willow was bi too. (she had a long crush on Xander, a minor crush on Giles, and of course Oz. I get the fluidity of sexuality, but I think if you jump from straight to lesbian instantly upon your first same-sex crush, it's much more likely you're simply misslabeling than it is that your sexuality made a complete U-turn in a matter of days)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-04-05 22:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
/breaks out the popcorn.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-04-05 08:14 pm (UTC)(link)so i could get behind one of your theories, there
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-04-05 08:15 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-04-05 20:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-04-06 02:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-04-05 22:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-04-06 00:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-04-06 00:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-04-05 23:44 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-04-05 22:31 (UTC) - Expandno subject
Where I come from that's called bisexuality. (Or pan-sexuality, I can totally see her hooking up with some trans gender queer person...)
I don't doubt a person when they say they are gay, or straight, but that's only if I have ZERO evidence to the contrary. I'm not saying that one shouldn't be able to decide what they are, but I'm so doubtful in this case. Unreliable narrator is a perfectly applicable term here. This is neither good, bad, or accusatory, but the assumption that her switch to dating two girls after being with two guys strictly defines a gender preference just because she said it, is just as outrageous and saying a character can't have a homosexual relationship because no where in cannon have they done so (and oh fandom, you know you love that. *achem* Rorschach *achem*)
Not trying to get into a fight, just responding to the OP Anon's comment okay? Peace in the valley kiddos!
Oh, and some of us haven't been super active in fandom and haven't had this convo yet, but are still huge fans.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-04-05 08:39 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-04-05 20:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-04-05 21:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-04-05 23:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I guess it does make for interesting discussion, but at the end of the day... Willow isn't a person at all, and that's a flaw I can't get around. /Party Pooper
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-04-05 08:48 pm (UTC)(link)I understand we want to categorize people, but really why do we need to here? If this was a real person, you'd have to be prepared for some confrontation if you think you can decide sexuality for someone else. BUT! Willow is a fictional character.
TPTB at Buffy are hardly experts on sexuality or consistent characterization. They wanted to tell a story a certain way, but the beauty of the fact that this is, once again, a fictional character means that people can interpret things their own way as well.
I've seen people ship just about everything under the sun. Die-hard straight male characters on TV shows are slashed like crazy. Cartoons are shipped. Characters from entirely different shows are crossover-shipped. Different species are shipped. Humans are shipped with robots. For the love of all that's good in this world, why do people get so damned hung up on whether or not we can/should ship a female character with her canon male or canon female or noncanon male or noncanon female or canon monster/vampire or noncanon monster/vampire etc etc etc love interest? If the fic (for example) is in character and respectful, a good writer could make anything credible. So ship whatever the hell you want, because it's a fictional character! I'm pretty sure fandom at large is big enough for all of us to find most of what we want without having to police what other people want.
It...really felt good to get that off my chest.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-04-06 03:41 (UTC) - Expandno subject
So, how many times do we have to explain that the fact that Willow identifies as a lesbian does not, in fact, invalidate her relationship with Oz? And why are people still pissed about this??
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-04-05 09:09 pm (UTC)(link)Willow didn't discover her sexuality until she met Tara. That doesn't erase or lessen her earlier relationships but those relationships aren't proof of Willow's bisexuality. Most gay men & women have het relationships before they come out. I believe this was the case with Willow & Willow/Oz.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-04-05 21:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-04-06 05:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-04-05 09:17 pm (UTC)(link)sexuality is so fluid, does it really matter what label we put on it? i'll admit there's a part of me that doesn't want her to be a lesbian because i'm a dude and i thought the character was really cute in s1-s3. otoh, i can see how having a lesbian character on a popular show is important to some people and how it's something that actually does matter. in the end, fandom is all about non-canonicity - fanfiction is about DEVIATIONS from canon, our discussions are about EXTRAPOLATIONS from canon as much as deductions from it, and in the end does it really matter what word you use and i just got fed up writing this
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-04-05 22:42 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-04-05 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)I'm not 100% sure on this though. Couldn't find a quote, but I think it makes sense.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-04-06 01:59 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-04-05 10:12 pm (UTC)(link)Anyway, no-one could ever compare to Oz. I always thought that was why Willow identified as a lesbian? (And I think the thing with Xander was due to hormones and sexual frustration.)
no subject
Here's a Question
(Anonymous) 2011-04-05 10:49 pm (UTC)(link)Is she straight?
Re: Here's a Question
(Anonymous) - 2011-04-06 00:06 (UTC) - ExpandOP
(Anonymous) - 2011-04-06 00:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Here's a Question
no subject
Anon 1: -makes WILLOW IS NOT GAY!1! secret-
Anon 2: -sees it- OMG -makes counter secret-
Anon 1: -sees it- HDU!!! -remakes original secret with different wording-
Anon 2: $%#@!!! -remakes counter secret with different wording-
And on and on and on . . .
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-04-05 22:55 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2011-04-05 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)That's not to say she didn't love Tara. But I still think Oz was her "one".
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-04-06 00:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-04-06 00:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)