ext_278733 (
grayout.livejournal.com) wrote in
fandomsecrets2007-06-11 04:20 pm
[ SECRET POST #157 ]
⌈ Secret Post #157 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.

10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.

16.
17.
18.
19.
Notes:
Early for no reason, really.
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 76 secrets from Secret Submission Post #023.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Tuesday, June 11th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: Here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
It's weird.
And in response to the secret-maker, if people realize s/he didn't mean it insultingly at all, then I don't understand why they jump to be offended.
no subject
I will say, though, that I've brought up this topic before with friends from all over the country, and it seems to fall far more in the favor of common slang than hideous insult. Then again, it might just be my friends.
no subject
And no no no, what I meant was given my own exposure to "faggot", I can't judge someone based SOLELY off their usage of it in this secret, given everyone IRL I know uses it regardless of stance on homosexuals. In fact, from my own indoctrinated perspective, the thought of judging based on simple usage in an anonymous context is ludicrous.
no subject
Extreme hunger my last piece of turkey bacon just can't satiate doesn't help my case either.
no subject
This just means that homophobia has become internalized in our culture, so much that "faggot" can be used as a general insult for idiots. Think about why it was first used as an insult, and think about how deeply ingrained heterosexism is in North American popular culture.
If you want to use the word? Go right ahead. But that doesn't mean that people won't take offense to it.
no subject
While I understand that me and my friends =\= representative of the whole, basic tenet of sociology, it is a direct contradiction to your own sociological analysis, which frankly is deeply coloured by your own bias (and understandably so).
There are plenty of words in the English language that were once highly offensive and no longer are, but it does not mean we've integrated a special breed of hate into our society to downplay them :\
no subject
So I will sit here and continue to think you are a giant idiot, but you really shouldn't be offended by that! Because "idiot" is just a general insult that no one uses seriously anymore and no longer means you have the intellect of a rock because all connotations of the word have been phased out with popular usage, and after all, I could be in your house beating you up or calling your worse names, so you shouldn't get upset!
no subject
You go on and do that now.
no subject
You also assume that the U.S. and America have vastly different cultures, when they're pretty much identical, especially since I live in Toronto, which might as well be the States.
Please keep on insisting that you're "cultured" because one day... one day someone might actually believe you. It might be the day when you stop using the word "faggot."
no subject
no subject
What I want to know is why you're insisting that using "faggot" is not homophobic but then imply that you live in a culture of homophobia in other comments (what with your "gay people here have much more to worry about than being called names hurhurhur" implies that they might be getting lynched or something).
Have you ever stopped to think that the prevalence of the usage where you live indicates a deep-rooted problem? And that using "gay" to mean "bad" is an extension of that? No? Lol, okay, faggot.
Faggot.
Faggot.
Faggot.
Faggot.
Faggot.
Faggot.
Faggot.
Faggot.
Faggot.
Faggot.
Faggot.
Faggot.
(Maybe if I keep saying it, I'll forget how harmful it is!)
no subject
What I have been saying this entire time is that, WHERE I AM, it's not homophobic when used as casual slang, which it is frequently. What I was ASKING is where and how is it different elsewhere?
Regardless, I got my answer and then some, so I'm done arguing. You can even have the last word!
no subject
Where you are, it is homophobic. You just can't see it, because it's not blatant, and apparently you need to be slapped over the face with homophobia in order for it to count. You do not live in the only place in the world where it is used casually(!!!!) and casual use does not make it okay(!!!!!) This is the point, and I have a feeling that you will continue to stick your fingers in your ears and go "LALALALALALALOLFAGS."
no subject
Casual use is not okay THE WAY YOU WERE FUCKING RAISED AND ACCORDING TO YOUR OWN OPINION.
Goddammit you are being fucking thick about this.
Think about it for ONE SECOND: Everyone understands that at one point those words were initially used as general insults because of the negative connotation of homosexuals, thus "lol you are gay" = "i equate you negatively with gay people ew", but as it becomes more standard as an insult and is used casually with NO ill will toward homosexuals, THAT MEANING CEASES TO BE.
You seem to think that by using the word, "fag", I am equating negativity with homosexuality, but when in my usage there is NO connotation of the sort, IT, AGAIN, CEASES TO BE A HOMOPHOBIC INSULT.
I am not scared of gay people. I am gay myself, which would normally not exclude me from homophobia were it not for the fact that I am PROUD of it, am FAR from self-loathing, and embrace other gay people as well.
Good fucking christ.
no subject
a) The culture I live in is a-okay with insults, and everyone insults each other, so it's okay to do so. And if you get offended, you're a fag.
b) I insult my friends all the time! It could be a term of endearment for all you know. And if you get offended, you're a fag.
c) You don't know anything about where I live, so you don't know the cultural relevence behind me insulting you. If you get offended, you are not only a fag but you are also ethnocentric hisshissbooboo
d) I insult myself. If you get offended, you are a fag.
e) I don't actually have any ill will towards you, so you can't possibly be offended! If you are? You're a fag.
no subject
no subject
Passive aggressiveness is so underrated these days.
no subject
no subject
"You can even have the last word!"
"You can even have the last word!"
"You can even have the last word!"
"You can even have the last word!"
"You can even have the last word!"
"You can even have the last word!"
Is making statements and then blatantly ignoring them in your own rage a cultural thing from Tennessee, too? I don't want to judge you or anything, because for all I know, that just might be the way y'all roll.
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
Like I said in a thread below, this argument is long over. My viewpoint's adjusted accordingly as is standard for a debate in someone else's favor, and we're all through here.