Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2011-08-09 08:07 pm
[ SECRET POST #1680 ]
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02. [repeat]
__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
21.

__________________________________________________
22.

__________________________________________________
23.

__________________________________________________
24.

__________________________________________________
25.

__________________________________________________
26.

__________________________________________________
27.

__________________________________________________
28.

__________________________________________________
29.

__________________________________________________
30.

__________________________________________________
31.

__________________________________________________
32.

__________________________________________________
33.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 102 secrets from Secret Submission Post #240.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - hit/ship/spiration ], [ 0 - omgiknowthem ], [ 0 - take it to comments ], [ 0 - repeats ]
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-08-10 12:33 am (UTC)(link)You're only passing due to this secret being a bit different from the recent ones we've had lately.
In case you aren't one? Subtext: You're doing it wrong and reading way too much into things that aren't really there. Like ship goggles...without the ships.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-08-10 12:44 am (UTC)(link)Because the Joker's main belief is in pure chaos for starters, not political affairs or global issues. This isn't even taking into consideration how long Batman has been a franchise.
The Joker representing the opposite of Batman's beliefs in killing and order? Yes, I can buy that. But reading into subtext that was never insisted upon by the writers in any fashion? Get back to me when you have links to interviews where Nolan states the Joker is a representation of the U.S. war on terrorism.
It's about as substantial as the Harmonian's "Symbolic Flight" theory otherwise.
no subject
ia, but ...
Re: ia, but ...
(Anonymous) - 2011-08-10 04:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ia, but ...
no subject
Also, you need to keep in mind that the writers pointing out a political subtext they intentionally made would be bad for the movie. If they did intentially make this movie pro-war-on-terrorism they would not want to point that out.
I don't really know wheather the symbolism was intentional or not, but it's definitely there. It's still an enjoyable movie regardless IMO.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-08-12 01:40 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-08-10 04:12 am (UTC)(link)That's what he said to Batman near the end, anyway...I guess who the fuck knows.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-08-10 17:45 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2011-08-10 12:38 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I think you're trolling, tbh.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-08-10 12:43 am (UTC)(link)nooooo
TROLL
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-08-10 12:48 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
no subject
OP
(Anonymous) 2011-08-10 09:37 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-08-10 01:05 am (UTC)(link)i am drunk so i can't
words
even if that was true or more overt (like 300) you can't isolate a piece of fiction from the time it was created. not that it's right but you'll see a huge trend thorough-out fiction of similar tendenceis of parroting villains after the evil of the particular time it was creatied
no subject
no subject
The only thing I can think of is if he starts acting like some weird Robin Hood figure, stealing from the bourgeois give to the oppressed lower classes. Only because he's crazy he'll do stuff like steal a million guns and give them to an orphanage or something. Or take lingerie to a battered women's shelter.
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-08-10 02:09 am (UTC)(link)Granted, his actions in the movie would probably classify him as one, and it would be politically slanted given that anarchy is a political movement (although he represents a fringe element rather than the Emma Goldman-style sort), but you have to think that the American government is REALLY fucked as to who it terms terrorists these days. I'd bet that the white Americans who bombed the Oklaholma City federal building back in the day would have a shitton of excusers on Fox if that happened today, and no one would want to call them terrorists.
no subject
In any case, I don't think the only alternative is that it's a "senseless action movie." It's a movie you can enjoy as a straightforward superhero action flick, but I think Christopher Nolan generally gives thought to more than just what's on the surface, or at least creates that appearance, and that makes a lot of his movies somewhat open to discussion.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I've run into people saying that before, and those people are idiots scrambling for relevancy. You could make an argument for the Joker being a terrorist, minus the political agenda (CAN an anarchist be a terrorist? Maybe. Probably) but the US government, especially the Bush government that ran the country when this movie was made, cannot legitimately be compared to fucking Batman.
no subject