case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2011-10-23 03:44 pm

[ SECRET POST #1755 ]

⌈ Secret Post #1755 ⌋


Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________

02.


__________________________________________________

03.


__________________________________________________

04.


__________________________________________________

05.


__________________________________________________

06.


__________________________________________________

07.


__________________________________________________

08.


__________________________________________________

09.


__________________________________________________

10.


__________________________________________________

11.


__________________________________________________

12.


__________________________________________________

13.


__________________________________________________

14.


__________________________________________________

15.


__________________________________________________

16.


__________________________________________________

17.


__________________________________________________

18.


__________________________________________________

19.


__________________________________________________

20.


__________________________________________________

21.


__________________________________________________

22.


__________________________________________________

23.


__________________________________________________

24.


__________________________________________________

25.


__________________________________________________

26.


__________________________________________________

27.


__________________________________________________

28.


__________________________________________________

29.


__________________________________________________

30.


__________________________________________________

31.


__________________________________________________

32.


__________________________________________________

33.


__________________________________________________

34.


__________________________________________________

35.


__________________________________________________

36.


__________________________________________________

37.


__________________________________________________

38.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 09 pages, 206 secrets from Secret Submission Post #251.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 1 2 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeats ]
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2011-10-23 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)
why tho
(deleted comment)

(Anonymous) 2011-10-24 12:05 am (UTC)(link)
why do you find it important for women to 'admit' they're exploiting men sexualy

i mean aside from the fact you're a man who's probably really buttmad that women get offended about the widespread exploitation of women but don't think it's a problem for women to schlick to gay erotica
(deleted comment)

(Anonymous) 2011-10-24 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
lollll


idgaf about your penis, what assures me that you're a sexist pile of whiny shit is the fact that you're a man whining about women exploiting men
(deleted comment)

(Anonymous) 2011-10-24 12:12 am (UTC)(link)
pretending that the ~exploitation of men~ by women is equal to the actual exploitation of women by men is sexist

hth
(deleted comment)

(Anonymous) 2011-10-24 12:19 am (UTC)(link)
l

o


l


ok 10/10 you really had me going there

much better at this 'trolling as a stupid bigoted pile of shit' thing than the homophobic troll down below

(Anonymous) 2011-10-24 12:30 pm (UTC)(link)
There isn't. Check your male white privilege, double-check, and then shut the fuck up.

(Anonymous) 2011-10-24 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
a woman is arguing with you?

better let her know what a fat ugly bitch she is, that will definitely let her and everyone else around her know how distinctly unmisogynist you are!
(deleted comment)

(Anonymous) 2011-10-24 12:18 am (UTC)(link)
lol you are fucking killing me

it's okay bb

if you can admit what a misogynist pile of shit you are you can learn how to rectify it

a little at least

first things first: don't compare feminism to nazism
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2011-10-24 00:25 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2011-10-24 00:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2011-10-24 00:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2011-10-24 12:33 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] veronica-rich.livejournal.com 2011-10-24 04:19 am (UTC)(link)
You weren't doing too badly until you pulled that card. Holy shit, do you live in a basement in sweatpants?
oxfordtweed: (Shoot a cabbie - Watson)

[personal profile] oxfordtweed 2011-10-24 03:12 am (UTC)(link)
God, IKR? I don't even try anymore.

(Anonymous) 2011-10-24 04:06 am (UTC)(link)
lol

poor men

they're soooooo oppressed by those evil feminazis
oxfordtweed: A large group of zombies reaches toward the camera (Zombies - Swarm)

I never sad that

[personal profile] oxfordtweed 2011-10-24 04:11 am (UTC)(link)
In fact, I left that comment before I even noticed that the thread was a mile long and full of idiocy. I'm just not sure what this comm's rules are in regard to comment deletion, so I didn't delete mine.

Although, this is exactly the sort of thing I meant, if I'm honest. I don't participate in these sorts of debates because I'm wrong no matter what I say. =/

Re: I never sad that

(Anonymous) 2011-10-24 05:05 am (UTC)(link)
there's an easy solution to that

lurk more

go to some feminist101 style communities and read the posts there

etc


for the record: agreeing with anyone complaining about 'dem feminazis' is a really stupid move, bc there is literally no way to seriously use the term feminazis and not be a trivializing misogynist
oxfordtweed: Cybermen throwing gang signs (Werd - Cybermen)

Re: I never sad that

[personal profile] oxfordtweed 2011-10-24 05:09 am (UTC)(link)
No, I agree that it was a stupid comment on my part, and the bit I was agreeing with was the part about often times, men simply aren't allowed to have an opinion on feminist matters.

But, the damage is done, so whatever. Nothing I say can fix it so I give up before anything even gets started.

Re: I never sad that

(Anonymous) - 2011-10-24 06:37 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2011-10-24 08:41 am (UTC)(link)
Maybe they believe your opinion isn't worth the time it took to write it because you think it's okay to use words like feminazi?

Surprise, women don't actually enjoy being compared to nazis!

[identity profile] fearless-rabbit.livejournal.com 2011-10-24 07:21 pm (UTC)(link)
David is an ass but... really? You don't think it's possible for straight people to exploit queerness?

I mean, straight people writing about queers doesn't need to be exploitative, it can be mutually beneficial if you do it right, but it absolutely can be exploitative and has been done very very wrong, so. Seriously?

(Anonymous) 2011-10-24 08:36 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm pretty sure it's impossible to exploit a sexual orientation.

Sure, there are bad slash fans out there who write offensive stereotypes and are generally creepy and fetishistic about the whole thing. But that's not 'exploiting homosexuality' that's 'fetishizing homosexuality'. Slightly different.

[identity profile] goobbledigook.livejournal.com 2011-10-24 09:59 pm (UTC)(link)
I completely agree. People are making this to be a opressing men vs opressed women thing but when you start writing about gay people you're putting gay men into it and like it or not, they are the ones who get a say in how they're represented. No amount of sexism and opression gives a straight person a pass in dismissing a queer persons views of how they are presented just because of their gender.

(Anonymous) 2011-10-24 10:21 pm (UTC)(link)
I like how you're assuming that a) davidshepphard is gay and b) the anons offended by his misogyny are straight.

Also, as I said above, I'm pretty sure it's impossible to exploit a sexual orientation.

[identity profile] goobbledigook.livejournal.com 2011-10-25 03:14 am (UTC)(link)
I don't recall ever mentioning davidsheppard or his sexuality on my post.

Their sexualities are irrelevant so long as they aren't what they're objectifying, ie gay males.

And I'm pretty sure she meant fetishizing of gay people done by straight people, sometimes people get messed up in semantics.