case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-01-08 04:11 pm

[ SECRET POST #1832 ]

⌈ Secret Post #1832 ⌋


Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________

02.


__________________________________________________

03.


__________________________________________________

04.


__________________________________________________

05.


__________________________________________________

06.


__________________________________________________

07.


__________________________________________________

08.


__________________________________________________

09.


__________________________________________________

10.


__________________________________________________

11.


__________________________________________________

12.


__________________________________________________

13.


__________________________________________________

14.


__________________________________________________

15.


__________________________________________________

16.


__________________________________________________

17.


__________________________________________________

18.


__________________________________________________

19.


__________________________________________________

20.


__________________________________________________

21.


__________________________________________________

22.






Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 139 secrets from Secret Submission Post #262.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeats ]
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2012-01-08 10:19 pm (UTC)(link)
it depends on how the op is meaning it, and how old the op is. if the op is being literal, "I won't do this thing because I will be punished," then it's moral reasoning on the level of a child, which can be psychologically normal well into the teenage years.

if the op is actually trying to communicate the idea of "I won't do this thing because it is illegal, as evidenced by jail being a punishment for it," then it's actually pretty average adult moral reasoning and a lot of people never "progress" past it because higher levels of moral reasoning are unnecessary to function as an adult in society.

tl;dr so i herd u liek laurence kohlberg's stages of moral development

[identity profile] omorka.livejournal.com 2012-01-08 10:35 pm (UTC)(link)
. . . So I put a social contract in ur Heinz dilemma so u could promote teh greatest good for teh greatest #? ;-)

[identity profile] angelus7988.livejournal.com 2012-01-09 01:58 am (UTC)(link)
if the op is actually trying to communicate the idea of "I won't do this thing because it is illegal, as evidenced by jail being a punishment for it," then it's actually pretty average adult moral reasoning and a lot of people never "progress" past it because higher levels of moral reasoning are unnecessary to function as an adult in society.

I think that holds true when the majority of people only need to follow the rules, rather than have any say in establishing what the rules are. On the other hand, if your average person is going to have any say in that, there needs to be a higher level of moral reasoning. Sorry, random observation.