Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-01-22 02:42 pm
[ SECERT POST #1846 ]
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
21.

__________________________________________________
22.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 110 secrets from Secret Submission Post #.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 3 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - hit/ship/spiration ], [ 0 - omgiknowthem ], [ 0 - take it to comments ], [ 0 - repeats ]
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments and concerns should go here.

no subject
But if it helped you join the protests, good for you.
no subject
no subject
THIS. Seriously, I explained that to someone and they keep repeating that it was SOPA's fault when the damned bill hasn't even been voted on.
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-01-22 10:05 pm (UTC)(link)Well, yeah, when I think about it I can see how that would be a hub for that sort of thing. Ugh...
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-01-23 12:06 am (UTC)(link)And yet, there doesn't seem to have been much if any thought put into how they intend to enforce it. And really, if they can't enforce it as regularly as they would speeding for example, they should not be trying to pass it.
I have to admit, the thing I find creepy about this is the way it's "guilty until proven innocent". Granted, I'm British, but I'm sure that for most other American laws that's the other way around.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-01-23 12:17 am (UTC)(link)Freaking this.
no subject
Especially as I don't know much about the workings of the internet, this is my biggest issue as well. SOPA and PIPA are just so constitutionally unstable that I can't believe that they're even up for discussion.
no subject
Now to a certain extent I'm only recently becoming aware of it so I'm sure that contributes in large part to this perception, but it honestly seems like there are currently a lot more laws going onto the Senate and House floors that include clauses about indefinite detention without evidence and hearing. I know this has been going on forever to a certain extent (e.g. Lincoln famously suspended Habeas Corpus during the Civil War) but it really feels like every other bill nowadays works around due process. And sure the lawmakers say "well it's just because of this particular loophole that blah blah blah..." and sometimes you get assurances like "as long as I'm president you don't have to worry about indefinite detention" but ultimately it's just them being too goddamn lazy and impatient to put citizens' basic rights over their own interests.
And you're right - it's too broad as well. It's a bunch of industry people freaking out and paying lobbyists to go do something about this scary thing they don't understand, so the lobbyists probably ask for stuff like that because it seems sorta-kinda-reasonable-ish if you have no idea how websites work or what the web is worth.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-01-23 05:10 pm (UTC)(link)*laughs* Don't we fucking know it? I wanted to put "as they would enforce the murder charge" or theft or child abuse, but I've been spending way too much time on "unfunny business" and the urge to add an asterix and have a "provided you're from a "good family" etc" at the bottom of the comment. Hell, now that I read it back I'm thinking "yeah "speeding" - there probably are still places that's code for "being black/latino/generally non-white and having a nice car"."
I've got to be honest I was scolding myself for thinking this bill was too stupid to be real when I remembered that county that was trying to get a bigger budget by claiming they'd have to decriminalise domestic violence. I shit you not.
When I actually had it laid for me what the bill meant...these people don't understand how the internet works. Or they haven't thought it through. Probably both.
I was actually quite scared, thinking about all the stuff I wouldn't be able to do if this got passed. Not going to be able to listen to as much music on youtube, can't use an image in a blog post unless I've created it. And I have to wonder if this is going to tighten up the legal fidgey-widgeyness surrounding fanfic.
It's weird in a very Orwellian way to think that people could take legal action over something so ethemeral. But then, to quote Criminal Minds; "It's the internet, once it's out there, it's there forever."
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-01-23 05:48 pm (UTC)(link)Yeah, I love that they can do this without SOPA and PIPA, and in addition get together funds and manpower to extradite a British student for a site that was ultimately made up of links to other sites and yet somehow after - what, twenty years? - they still can't get it together to bring Polanski back to the State so he can actually serve that sentence for the crime he was tried and found guilty of.
And by "love", I mean it makes me want to threaten cruel and unusual physical violence to these people making these decisions until they admit that money matters more than people.
I know, I know; the situations are completely different, there are other factors, he has powerful friends. I still think the money being put into bringing that kid to America so he stand trial over internet links would be better spent making an example of Polanski.
no subject