case: ([ Renge; It's so beautiful! ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-07-11 05:46 pm

[ SECRET POST #187 ]


⌈ Secret Post #187 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.




Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 050 secrets from Secret Submission Post #027.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 ] broken links, 0 not!secrets, [ 1 ] not!fandom, [ 1 ] personal attack.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Thursday, July 9th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

16.

(Anonymous) 2007-07-12 04:52 am (UTC)(link)
The text in [livejournal.com profile] mithrigil's banner refers to the character in the banner, Albert Silverberg, not to [livejournal.com profile] mithrigil herself. Mith is actually quite nice-- the Suikoden and Final Fantasy XII fandoms, of which she is a member, have some of the nicest BNFs I've seen-- I can't remember ever seeing a stereotypical BNF in either fandom, at least on LJ. Yes, she's made some factual mistakes in some of her fics (at least in regards to canon), but she actually listens to and uses concrit, and has some of the best writing of any ficcer I've seen.

Re: 16.

(Anonymous) 2007-07-12 06:42 am (UTC)(link)
Seriously. Poor Mith, I'm not even on her f-list, I just read her work occasionally, but I don't ever recall seeing her act in a way to deserve this.

Doesn't secret #16 fall a little too close to personal attack? Or is that only if the secret-poster uses the target's real name or username as opposed to something that's just very readily identifiable as belonging to them?

Re: 16.

[identity profile] maeda.livejournal.com 2007-07-12 11:09 am (UTC)(link)
No, it doesn't. You have to outright use the name for it to count. I don't know who the hell she is, anyway, and by pointing it out you're only contributing to the problem.