case: ([ Renge; It's so beautiful! ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-07-11 05:46 pm

[ SECRET POST #187 ]


⌈ Secret Post #187 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.




Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 050 secrets from Secret Submission Post #027.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 ] broken links, 0 not!secrets, [ 1 ] not!fandom, [ 1 ] personal attack.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Thursday, July 9th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: 16.

(Anonymous) 2007-07-12 06:42 am (UTC)(link)
Seriously. Poor Mith, I'm not even on her f-list, I just read her work occasionally, but I don't ever recall seeing her act in a way to deserve this.

Doesn't secret #16 fall a little too close to personal attack? Or is that only if the secret-poster uses the target's real name or username as opposed to something that's just very readily identifiable as belonging to them?

Re: 16.

[identity profile] maeda.livejournal.com 2007-07-12 11:09 am (UTC)(link)
No, it doesn't. You have to outright use the name for it to count. I don't know who the hell she is, anyway, and by pointing it out you're only contributing to the problem.