case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-06-08 06:38 pm

[ SECRET POST #1984 ]


⌈ Secret Post #1984 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.
[Little Shop of Horrors]


__________________________________________________



14.
[Sherlock BBC]


__________________________________________________



15. http://i.imgur.com/Jxlnf.png
[sort of porny and possible underage; photomanip, Snape/Hermione]

__________________________________________________















[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]












16. [SPOILER WARNING for Arrested Development]
[TRIGGER WARNING for incest]



__________________________________________________



17. [TRIGGER WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



18. [TRIGGER WARNING for abuse, suicide]



__________________________________________________



19. [TRIGGER WARNING for sexual violence, rape, coercion, cult like mentalities, and violence]



__________________________________________________



20. [TRIGGER WARNING for pedophilia]

[Let the Right One In/Låt den rätte komma in]


__________________________________________________



21. [TRIGGER WARNING for body horror, gore]

[Parasyte]


__________________________________________________



22. [TRIGGER WARNING for abuse]



__________________________________________________






Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #283.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2012-06-08 10:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Get... help, then?

If you can find an anonymous solution (a support internet community, maybe?) go for that.

Don't try to normalize it or encourage it by justifying it to yourself, or by seeking out other people who feel the same way. That will only make it harder to stop.

(Anonymous) 2012-06-08 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)
If it's just about one fictional character and the OP feels no urges to have sex with actual 11-year-olds, then who cares.

(Anonymous) 2012-06-08 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't want to start the same old dance and song that pops up whenever the "but they're fictional / think of the fictional children" argument starts, but this is an actual real life child, not just a drawing.

(And I would argue that, even if "they're only drawings", that's still trying to normalize the idea of pedophilia, intentionally or not. Plus porn drawings used to groom children by real pedophiles, blah blah blah.)

(Anonymous) 2012-06-09 12:02 am (UTC)(link)
What pisses me off is when the SJW try to normalise it and accuse you of "shaming" if you object.

I mean, if they are entirely fictional fantasises than fine, but this kid is real.

(Anonymous) 2012-06-09 12:08 am (UTC)(link)
SJW (like, the crappy internet ones that get off by being oh so superior to everyone else and belittling others, not the ones that are genuinely trying to make a difference in the world, I mean) are fantastic at making shitty double standards like those. :/
kallanda_lee: (Default)

[personal profile] kallanda_lee 2012-06-09 12:33 am (UTC)(link)
I also think it really depends on how old OP is - if they're 15 they might still be identifying with younger people themselves, and there objectively isn't that much difference. They might still grow out of it/not be a pedophile.

If they're 30, it's probably another story.

first anon

(Anonymous) 2012-06-09 12:54 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, I agree. Relative age (and life experience) makes a lot of difference.

[personal profile] inkedfeathers 2012-06-09 02:09 pm (UTC)(link)
You can still identify with younger people even as an adult.

The idea that you can't is preposterous to me and is something I will never, ever understand. Children and adults aren't THAT fundamentally different that you can't identify at all with their personalities!

Then again, I can relate to someone without there being any sexual aspect to it, so... maybe I'm just not the norm.

(Anonymous) 2012-06-09 02:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Adults who identify with children on a sexual level are generally pedophiles. A lot of pedophiles aren't out to maliciously control kids, they just mentally and sexually identify with younger kids and so think being attracted to younger kids is ideal/normal for them.

You can identify with all personalities and ages, yes, but trying to inject that argument into a discussion about pedophilia is kind of derailing and wrong. It reads as justifying pedophiles and making excuses for them.

[personal profile] inkedfeathers 2012-06-09 02:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Sorry, I'm just irritated by that line of thinking whenever I see it, so I jumped the gun and said that without thinking too much about how it might read in the context of the overall argument. ^^;;

I'm certainly not intending to excuse pedophiles!

My apologies. ^^;

(Anonymous) 2012-06-09 04:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Understandable. It's hard sometimes in F!S to keep the overall context of discussions in mind, because replies and conversations can just veer off or get out of control.