Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-06-08 06:38 pm
[ SECRET POST #1984 ]
⌈ Secret Post #1984 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

[Little Shop of Horrors]
__________________________________________________
14.

[Sherlock BBC]
__________________________________________________
15. http://i.imgur.com/Jxlnf.png
[sort of porny and possible underage; photomanip, Snape/Hermione]
__________________________________________________
[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
16. [SPOILER WARNING for Arrested Development]
[TRIGGER WARNING for incest]

__________________________________________________
17. [TRIGGER WARNING for rape]

__________________________________________________
18. [TRIGGER WARNING for abuse, suicide]

__________________________________________________
19. [TRIGGER WARNING for sexual violence, rape, coercion, cult like mentalities, and violence]

__________________________________________________
20. [TRIGGER WARNING for pedophilia]

[Let the Right One In/Låt den rätte komma in]
__________________________________________________
21. [TRIGGER WARNING for body horror, gore]

[Parasyte]
__________________________________________________
22. [TRIGGER WARNING for abuse]

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #283.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: DA
You know, I can agree with that to some extent. Someone next to you casually mentions they're in the Klan and death to all darkies, yo? Shut them down hard, ride them out of town on a rail, and so on.
However.
Someone calls a movie "lame"? They don't deserve to have hellfire rained down upon them for a moment of insensitive ignorance. They also don't deserve to have more hellfire rained upon them after they've already apologized and fixed whatever was causing issue, and they certainly don't deserve to be stalked across websites to be further ridiculed long after the fact.
Unfortunately, at least hanging around communities like this one, I see way more incidents of people dog-piling relatively minor faux pas far out of proportion to the offense and not very much actual standing-up-against-*ism. People making passing, minor comments shouldn't trigger the level of invective that SJWs bring against them...especially when it's often not clear whether the person making a seemingly -ist remark is actually part of that oppressed group themselves and is consciously reclaiming a word or just plain not bothered by a word. Except then they get accused of being, basically, brainwashed and not counting as whatever they are, because the SJW doesn't care about any particular individual.
The reason why we have the term "social justice warrior" is refer to those who can't make the distinction between well-intentioned ignorance and actual prejudice, who react out of proportion to whatever slight they perceive has occurred regardless of whether reality actually fits their version of events, and cannot or do not choose their battles (spending a month attacking someone for "lame" rather than, say, rallying against someone like Rush Limbaugh who says truly disgusting things on a regular basis and to far greater harm to society than the "lame movie"-commenter could ever do). The extremists, in other words. And if you think that someone who makes a "lame movie" comment deserves to be driven out of a community and ostracized, then you know where you fall on the Social Justice advocate spectrum.
ETA: It's like the difference between being a nice guy and a Nice Guy. SJWs are the Nice Guys of social justice.
Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2012-06-09 05:38 am (UTC)(link)Re: DA
Re: DA
Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2012-06-09 01:30 pm (UTC)(link)But you know what? You're absolutely right. You nailed it. Nice Guys (those who really do deserve the epithet) are just like SJWs. Ask them "Why aren't you getting the romantic attention/agreement with your social justice views that you want?" and without hesitation they'll say "It's because they're fucked in the head! They're hypnotized by testosterone-fueled bullies! They're programmed by patriarchy and rape culture! They aren't smart enough to know what I know, which is that they should not only be flocking to me in droves but shaking with emotion as they thank me for showing them the right way!!"
Meanwhile everyone around them can see the frankly terrifying entitlement complex these people carry around with them. "I should get what I want, right away!! If you're a female I think is cute, you should be falling in love with my nerdy charm! If you're a stranger on the Internet, you should drop whatever opinions you have about race and sex and disability and take up mine! If you don't do these things, that means you're fucked in the head!!" (That line of "It's not my responsibility to educate you; educate yourself!" is always a give-away; is there any clearer way to express the sentiment "It's very important for you to give me what I'm entitled to but I can't be expected to actually expend any of my effort!"?)
this this this this this
(Anonymous) 2012-06-09 03:45 pm (UTC)(link)Amen!
(Anonymous) 2012-06-09 04:36 pm (UTC)(link)Re: DA