Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-06-14 06:48 pm
[ SECRET POST #1990 ]
⌈ Secret Post #1990 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Calvin and Hobbes]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Golden Sun]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Downton Abbey]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Beyond: Two Souls]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Veep]
__________________________________________________
07.

[John Cooper Clarke]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Kristen Stewart]
__________________________________________________
09.

[A Song of Ice and Fire/Game of Thrones]
__________________________________________________
10.

[The Social Network]
__________________________________________________
11.

[Ray Bradbury]
__________________________________________________
12.

[Protomen]
__________________________________________________
13.

[Hamish & Andy]
__________________________________________________
14.

[Falling Skies]
__________________________________________________
15.

[Hetalia]
__________________________________________________
16.

[Legend of Korra]
__________________________________________________
17.

[Dragon Age: Origins]
__________________________________________________
18.

[Minecraft]
__________________________________________________
19.

[Jojo's Bizarre Adventure: Diamond is Unbreakable]
__________________________________________________
20.

[Avengers]
__________________________________________________
21.

__________________________________________________
22.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 025 secrets from Secret Submission Post #284.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
ethnicity and race are primarily social constructs yeah but both also have biological parameters; if you consider ethnicity the shared heritage of your ancestors than referring to yourself as - for instance - german (in an ethnic sense) is still correct
the major discrepancy in this thread is between referring to labels like irish and german as nationalities and referring to them as ethnicities that are shared through ancestry
no subject
no subject
there's also no concrete definition for people who refer to themselves as "german" - be them citizens of germany or those of german ancestry - so claiming somebody "can't be german" merely because they live elsewhere is inherently false, which is my point.
no subject
no subject
implying i somehow support eugenics when i'm an adamant opponent of it is both insulting and unfounded. i already explained that biological parameters are present in ethnic and racial groups, despite their social implications, so writing biological attributes off because you apparently think they can only be one or the other is unfounded too.
also eugenics is controlled selection through genetic differences as a whole, it initially had nothing to do with ethnicity and race. so by this logic you should be just as offended, if not more so, on discussion relating to, say, hair colour or gender, despite both of these demographics also having actual genetic differences.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-06-15 03:09 am (UTC)(link)no subject
so overall i don't see what's so disconcerting about ancestral genetics being brought up as a point of discussion.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-06-15 03:29 am (UTC)(link)no subject
i'm not "wrong" but you're more than welcome to enlighten me as to what exactly you think i'm "wrong" about. biological parameters, for like the 4th time, are factually present in ethnicities and races. if i were to say these parameters were detrimental to society, then yeah, you'd have a point. except i'm not fucking saying that at all, and you're just seeing what you want to see in order to be offended by something that isn't being said.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-06-15 03:39 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-06-15 04:04 am (UTC)(link)I agree with you, for whatever it's worth, but this is the result you're risking when for some reason or another, you don't know or take into account the different contexts that people are coming with when they look at internet posts and such.
I say this as someone who has stumbled headfirst into wank landmines for coming from a different culture where discriminatory problems come in a different flavor than, say, America, where there is a bigger percentage of immigrants from a huge number of different places in the world, compared to other countries, and so the social problems are of a different variety than I ever expected. (Not that America is the only place where this sort of thing happens, obviously, but I'm just using the first example that came to mind!)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-06-15 02:34 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-06-15 02:55 am (UTC)(link)Such things should never be excuses to treat other people badly.