case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-06-26 05:29 pm

[ SECRET POST #2002 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2002 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 066 secrets from Secret Submission Post #286.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - text comments ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2012-06-26 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm kind of doubting this secret...

Also surprised that this wasn't warned for? Does it have to be a reference to an actual incestuous situation to merit a warning? jw, I'm not actually triggered by it, but it seemed kind of odd...

(Anonymous) 2012-06-26 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
IDK i wouldn't say someone crushing on an uncle needs a trigger warning, it's not like incest is happening or nonconsensual (if it were an uncle crushing on a niece that'd be squicky because he's the one with more power)
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2012-06-27 12:31 am (UTC)(link)
Coupling it with that picture was kind of jarring, imo, but I guess as long as no harm is done...

(Anonymous) 2012-06-27 02:05 am (UTC)(link)
I believe secrets are only tagged as triggery if the secret poster noted that in their original comment?