Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-07-02 06:36 pm
[ SECRET POST #2008 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2008 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 088 secrets from Secret Submission Post #287.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-02 10:50 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-03 12:12 am (UTC)(link)Mostly that's my take on it. I don't mind ~forever romances~ if the intended audience is young because the tone of the work is, well, fantasy-ish, really. If I didn't get a detailed, realistic account of how a certain conflict affects people (psychological effects of war/real-life politics, etc) then I'm not gonna expect realistic romance either. It'd be tedious, to be honest.
*This doesn't mean the romance can't be well written. And god knows Makorra was not well written.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-03 04:59 am (UTC)(link)Endgame pairings that started in school:
- James/Lily
- Molly/Arthur
- Harry/Ginny
- Ron/Hermione
Engame pairings that didn't start in school:
- Draco/Astoria
- Neville/Hannah
- Luna/Rolf
- Percy/Audrey
- Bill/Fleur
- Tonks/Remus
- George/Angelina
There are more couples, like Lucius/Narcissa, Alice/Frank, Bellatrix/Rodolphus, Andromeda/Ted, etc, but we don't know if they got together in school or afterwards. So there are actually more couples that DIDN'T start in school. (Angelina going to the ball with Fred doesn't count. That's not dating, and he and Fred are individual people. :P)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-02 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-02 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)Yeah, I get why JKR did it. I mean, if they had all ended up marrying people that they didn't go to school with, or at least different people from their school it would have been more realistic but you would have had all these people going "What the Christ is this shit? Why is Harry Potter with some woman named [whatever]. FUCK YOU ROWLING WHY HAVE YOU BETRAYED ME". It's just easier to stick them with people familiar to the audience. Honestly, I just wish there hadn't been an epilogue at all and people could have thought they all married whoever the hell wanted them to marry.
On the other hand though, Draco and Percy got to marry random people, when it would have been easier to just say that Percy got with Penny and Draco ended up with Pansy or whatever. And Neville ended up with Hannah Abott, which I didn't see coming but I actually like.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-03 02:38 am (UTC)(link)It really would have been better to leave out the Epilogue. Maybe mention how weeks later or something Harry's scar didn't hurt and everyone was working together to rebuild and years later things were peaceful.
I kind sort of see the need to make things come full-circle, but it wasn't necessary to get so detailed with the spouses and children and so on.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-03 03:02 am (UTC)(link)Yeah, I think she just really didn't want to leave any loose ends. The woman was done writing Harry Potter and I guess she wanted to make that clear. And if she hadn't written an epilogue, there just would have been a ton of people being like "But who did they marry? Did Harry have children? WHY DIDN'T YOU WRITE A FREAKING EPILOGUE OR SOMETHING??" and of course, the epilogue she did write just didn't satisfy a lot of people (including me). The woman couldn't have won either way.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-03 04:57 am (UTC)(link)- James/Lily
- Molly/Arthur
- Harry/Ginny
- Ron/Hermione
Engame pairings that didn't start in school:
- Draco/Astoria
- Neville/Hannah
- Luna/Rolf
- Percy/Audrey
- Bill/Fleur
- Tonks/Remus
- George/Angelina
There are more couples, like Lucius/Narcissa, Alice/Frank, Bellatrix/Rodolphus, Andromeda/Ted, etc, but we don't know if they got together in school or afterwards. So there are actually more couples that DIDN'T start in school. (Angelina going to the ball with Fred doesn't count. That's not dating, and he and Fred are individual people. :P)
Wrong genre
The point? The upper classes tend(ed) to marry people from their own class, and stay married. They tend(ed) to marry relatively young. They tend(ed) to marry people they had known from childhood, who were family friends or friends of friends.
The wizarding world is small. If you're going to marry a British wizard and avoid the potential problems of a muggle/wizard marriage, plus the complication that you're unlikely to get to know many muggles that well, you're going to be marrying someone from Hogwarts. It's not like there's a variety of wizarding universities that people go to, splitting couples up for those years and mixing them with other potential partners.
Re: Wrong genre
(Anonymous) 2012-07-03 09:35 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-03 08:57 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-09 01:14 am (UTC)(link)